The lateral wrist radiograph - To retake or not to retake

Mussmann, Bo Redder; Milner, Robert; Barlow, N.; Jensen, Jacob Hjelmager

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2022.10.013

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The consensus of experienced radiographers agreed with the consensus of radiologists for 75.3% of rejected images. This result supports the suggestion in the literature that experience is a major factor in correct identification of acceptability of imaging 6,20 . The experienced radiographers in this study all worked during their formative years on plain‐film radiography and have had ongoing clinical practice for more than 15 years.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…These results strongly support the suggestion that radiographers are focussing on pre‐determined image criteria and the pursuit of the perfect ‘textbook’ image and not the ability to consider clinically driven diagnostic conclusions 3,10 . This supports the call for the radiographic community to invest in general radiography as a specialist modality and take a lead role in better understanding the clinical relevance of their imaging 16,20,36,37 …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 71%

“…3,10 This supports the call for the radiographic community to invest in general radiography as a specialist modality and take a lead role in better understanding the clinical relevance of their imaging. 16,20,36,37 In an editorial on evidence-based radiography, Snaith 37 describes the term 'practice creep' as 'a gradual, often imperceptible, change in technique occurring with, or without, a grounded theory or evidence base'. 37 Assuming these results are representative of a trend that exists in departments elsewhere, is it, therefore, possible that we are seeing a creep in rejecting adequate imaging?…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This result supports the suggestion in the literature that experience is a major factor in correct identification of acceptability of imaging. 6 , 20 The experienced radiographers in this study all worked during their formative years on plain‐film radiography and have had ongoing clinical practice for more than 15 years. Their ongoing experience has likely contributed to their aptitude for technical critique and clinical assessment of imaging.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The wrist is one of the more commonly fractured anatomical regions, 18 , 19 , 20 accounting for 7% of all fractures in Australia. 19 Radiography is often the first and only imaging examination utilised for diagnosis and management of wrist injuries.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The cost of perfection: An investigation into the unnecessary rejection of clinically acceptable lateral wrist imaging

Steward,

Semsem,

Currie

et al. 2023

J of Medical Radiation Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThis study illustrates image rejection rates of the lateral wrist x‐ray projection at a large, public teaching hospital. Rejected images were evaluated to determine the number of images that needed to be repeated based on the clinical indication. This study highlights the difference in subjective image‐repeat decision‐making skills existing between radiologists, experienced radiographers and junior radiographers.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all rejected lateral wrist x‐ray images by a panel of three radiologists, three experienced radiographers and six junior radiographers. This review aimed to determine if rejected imaging met the consideration of the clinical indication and assumed appropriate acquisition of an orthogonal projection. A complement of images that had not been rejected were included in the review to create a blinded study.ResultsThe review demonstrated 85.8% of rejected images were deemed to meet clinical requirements according to radiologists. The experienced radiographers agreed with radiologists regarding 75.3% of images. Junior radiographers agreed with radiologists in 34.2% of cases. Junior radiographers were three times more likely to seek repeat imaging than the radiologists and experienced radiographers.ConclusionsThis review demonstrated a lateral wrist projection reject rate of 38.7% with unnecessary repeats according to clinical indications in 85.8% of cases. The review of experienced radiographers was comparable to radiologists; however, the difference in decision‐making skills was evident in the junior radiographers. This highlights an alarming trend, should similar results be demonstrated at other health services and indicates an unnecessary burden to clinical practice. Inclusion of clinical reasoning for imaging and the need for repeat imaging is recommended for radiography training programs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 71%