2013
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00349.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lateral intraparietal area codes the location of saccade targets and not the dimension of the saccades that will be made to acquire them

Abstract: Steenrod SC, Phillips MH, Goldberg ME. The lateral intraparietal area codes the location of saccade targets and not the dimension of the saccades that will be made to acquire them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A neural population code model of LIP proposed by Graf & Andersen (2014) equates presaccadic target position with planned future eye position. However, under conditions of saccadic adaptation, visual and presaccadic activity in LIP are tuned for the stimulus location and not for the saccade amplitude (Steenrod et al 2013), so presaccadic target position cannot be used rigorously to calculate postsaccadic eye position.…”
Section: Neural Evidence For Craniotopic Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A neural population code model of LIP proposed by Graf & Andersen (2014) equates presaccadic target position with planned future eye position. However, under conditions of saccadic adaptation, visual and presaccadic activity in LIP are tuned for the stimulus location and not for the saccade amplitude (Steenrod et al 2013), so presaccadic target position cannot be used rigorously to calculate postsaccadic eye position.…”
Section: Neural Evidence For Craniotopic Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6B. Neurons in the lateral intraparietal (LIP) of the simian cortex show no change in activity during adaptation of either MG or targeting saccades in the monkey (Steenrod et al 2013). Therefore, the site of MG saccade adaptation is likely downstream of the LIP.…”
Section: Speculation On Possible Neuronal Sites Of Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have approached this question from the perspectives of (1) effector specificity (i.e., where and how is a general gaze command apportioned into separate commands for eye and head motion) and (2) what reference frames are used to code these variables (e.g., eye, head, or body centered). These questions remain controversial (Caruso et al, 2018), but the predominant consensus is that higher level structures like SC, LIP, and FEF primarily code target and/or gaze direction relative to initial eye orientation, with default effector-specific codes and reference frames developed downstream (Sparks, 1989(Sparks, , 2002bSparks and Hartwich-Young, 1989;Klier et al, 2001;Crawford et al, 2011;Steenrod et al, 2013). Consistent with this view, we recently quantified twodimensional SC and FEF response fields (RFs) during naturally variable eye-head gaze shifts, and found that eye-centered coordinates provided better fits to the data than effector-specific codes and frames of reference (De-Souza et al, 2011;Sadeh et al, 2015;Sajad et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%