1990
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.72b5.2211772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lateral condylar prominence. A complication of supracondylar osteotomy for cubitus varus

Abstract: We reviewed 27 patients who had supracondylar closing wedge osteotomy for cubitus varus. There were 10 excellent and 12 good results. However, of these 22 patients, 14 had a significant bony prominence over the lateral condylar region caused by lateral displacement of the elbow when closing the osteotomy. This prominence was less obvious in patients who had their osteotomy at a young age, but worse after operations near or after skeletal maturity. This difference appeared to be due to remodelling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most series report experience in older children aged 10-1 4 years (Carlson and Rosman 1982, McCoy and Piggot 1988, Laupattarakasem et al 1989, Gaddy et al 1994. Some authors recommend early correction during childhood which improves remodeling of an extension deformity and a lateral prominence (Bellemore et al 1984, Wong et al 1990, Voss et al 1994. When corrective osteotomy is performed in small children, Voss et al (1994) has recommended a lateral closing wedge osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most series report experience in older children aged 10-1 4 years (Carlson and Rosman 1982, McCoy and Piggot 1988, Laupattarakasem et al 1989, Gaddy et al 1994. Some authors recommend early correction during childhood which improves remodeling of an extension deformity and a lateral prominence (Bellemore et al 1984, Wong et al 1990, Voss et al 1994. When corrective osteotomy is performed in small children, Voss et al (1994) has recommended a lateral closing wedge osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral prominence index (LPI) was measured on pre-and postoperative anteroposterior radiographs. 20) LPI was defined as the difference between the medial and lateral widths of the distal part of the humerus, from the longitudinal mid-humeral axis, and it was expressed as a percentage of the total width of the distal part of the humerus (Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinal axis of the forearm was determined by using the midpoints of the upper and lower transverse lines, limited to the medial and lateral cortexes of the ulna and radius, respectively [15]. To avoid any negative effects of radiographic magnifications and individual variations, we used the method of Wong et al [33] to calculate the elbow LPI. In this method, the humeral longitudinal axis divides the transepicondylar line into lateral and medial parts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%