2012
DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Later, the Better? Early, Average, and Late Timing of Sexual Experiences in Adolescence and Psychosocial Adjustment in Young Adulthood

Abstract: The present article challenges the assumption that later timing of sexual experiences is unequivocally associated with higher psychosocial adjustment. Data from two representative cross-sectional German studies conducted in 1996 and 2005 were analyzed to examine the psychosocial adjustment of young adults (age 20–29) who had their first sexual experiences early (before age 16), at an average age (between age 16 and 18), or late (later than age 18 or not yet). Early timing of sexual experiences was associated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given prior research documenting the association between timing of sexual initiation and health and well-being (Haase et al, 2012; Sandfort et al, 2008; Spriggs & Halpern, 2008a; 2008b), and the possibility that sexual inexperience among young adults may be linked with emotional, social, and psychological outcomes, it is important to identify factors that influence engaging in a number of different sexual activities at non-normative ages, both early and late, as well as remaining inexperienced into one's mid-twenties and early thirties. Thus, the present study explores age cut-offs that mark the entry into sexual behaviors (both vaginal and oral sex) for both young women and men, which were then used to create sexual initiation timing categories (i.e.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Given prior research documenting the association between timing of sexual initiation and health and well-being (Haase et al, 2012; Sandfort et al, 2008; Spriggs & Halpern, 2008a; 2008b), and the possibility that sexual inexperience among young adults may be linked with emotional, social, and psychological outcomes, it is important to identify factors that influence engaging in a number of different sexual activities at non-normative ages, both early and late, as well as remaining inexperienced into one's mid-twenties and early thirties. Thus, the present study explores age cut-offs that mark the entry into sexual behaviors (both vaginal and oral sex) for both young women and men, which were then used to create sexual initiation timing categories (i.e.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When young people experience major life transitions, such as engaging in vaginal or oral sex, is often regulated by cultural norms, beliefs, and expectations, which are often based on age (Elder, 1994). Indeed research shows that violating age-graded norms, such as engaging in sexual activity at a non-normative age (both early and late) is related to young people's well-being as they grow and develop (Haase, Landberg, Schmidt, Lüdke, & Silbereisen, 2012; Harden, 2012; Spriggs & Halpern, 2008a; 2008b). Therefore, it is important to identify the risk and protective factors associated with non-normative sexual initiation, which in turn influences later development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Madkour et al (2010) explain that there is no consensus definition of early sexual initiation, and it is unclear whether a definition should be drawn from the statistical distribution of age at first intercourse or based on an age before which individuals who initiate sexual intercourse are more susceptible to negative outcomes. Absent a single standard, researchers typically define early sexual initiation as occurring at or before 14–16 years old (Haase, Landberg, Schmidt, Lüdke, & Silbereisen, 2012; Hallfors et al, 2004; Madkour, Farhat, Halpern, Godeau, & Gabhainn, 2010; Rector, Johnson, & Noyes, 2003; Waller et al, 2006; Zimmer-Gembeck & Helfand, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%