2011
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.05028-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Latency-Associated UL138 Gene Product of Human Cytomegalovirus Sensitizes Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) Signaling by Upregulating TNF-α Receptor 1 Cell Surface Expression

Abstract: Many viruses antagonize tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-␣) signaling in order to counteract its antiviral properties. One way viruses achieve this goal is to reduce TNF-␣ receptor 1 (TNFR1) on the surface of infected cells. Such a mechanism is also employed by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), as recently reported by others and us. On the other hand, TNF-␣ has also been shown to foster reactivation of HCMV from latency. By characterizing a new variant of HCMV AD169, we show here that TNFR1 downregulation by HCMV … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is intriguing to speculate how these proteins may indirectly target one another through their interaction with cellular factors. While pUL138 has been shown to increase the levels of surface TNFR (31,32) and decrease the levels of surface MRP-1 (33), pUL135 has not been implicated in the counterregulation of these proteins. Our data suggest an elegant mechanism by which the virus coordinately regulates the expression of two determinants from a single genetic locus which oppose one another with respect to their effects on viral replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is intriguing to speculate how these proteins may indirectly target one another through their interaction with cellular factors. While pUL138 has been shown to increase the levels of surface TNFR (31,32) and decrease the levels of surface MRP-1 (33), pUL135 has not been implicated in the counterregulation of these proteins. Our data suggest an elegant mechanism by which the virus coordinately regulates the expression of two determinants from a single genetic locus which oppose one another with respect to their effects on viral replication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pUL133-pUL138 complex appears to cooperatively function in promoting a latent infection, as viruses containing disruptions in pUL133, pUL138, or both replicate with increased efficiency in CD34 ϩ cells (27,30). pUL138 has been shown to increase cell surface levels of TNFR (31,32) and decrease surface levels of MRP-1 (33), although the significance of these surface alterations to viral infection is not completely understood. The roles of pUL135 and pUL136 have not yet been described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the genome of the prototype laboratory strain, AD169, genomes of low-passage HCMV clinical isolates contain the UL/b' region, including ORFs UL133-UL151, considered as a critical candidate cluster to clinical pathogenesis (3). Although the UL/b' region is not essential to viral growth or replication (4), products of this region, including UL141, UL142 and UL144 have been experimentally identified to aid in viral escape from immune surveillance through interactions with cellular molecules (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latency-expressed UL138 ORF has recently been shown to modulate cell surface expression of TNF receptor 1 (26,27), suggesting that TNF signaling may impact HCMV latency, as has been shown for mouse CMV (36). A second connection between the TNF family and UL/b= region proteins is highlighted by the UL144 ORF, which shows high homology to the herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM/TNFRSF14) (37,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several proteins encoded in this region have been established to perform immune-modulatory functions (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). Recently, this genomic locus has also been implicated in the regulation of experimental latency (18,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%