2013
DOI: 10.32508/stdj.v16i2.1429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The late Pleistocene-Holocene sedimentary facies and geotechnical properties of CLM1 core at Cao Lanh city Mekong river delta

Abstract: The aim of the study was to know a trend of mechanical behavior and geotechnical properties; applied for, calculating the mechanical behavior of the ground, planning the infrastructure, specially the traffic system and port, and building a rational investigated-procedure by combinations of in-situ tests, sampling and laboratory tests. Sedimentary environments of the CLM1 core at Caolanh city, Mekong River Delta (MRD) were reestablished based upon the deposit properties. Investigate the geotechnical properties … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil behaviour can be highly influenced by depositional and post‐depositional processes (Truong et al ., 2011; Sarti et al ., 2012). As different facies have distinct geotechnical and geomechanical characteristics (Truong et al ., 2013; Lorenzo et al ., 2014), facies characterization through CPTU could be utilized to make predictions about the 3D spatial distribution of geomechanically ‘weak’ versus ‘strong’ deposits, aside from any specific geographic location. Through the analysis of CPTU profiles, for example, soft, unconsolidated Holocene deposits with low Qc and Fs can be easily distinguished from stiff (high Qc and Fs) and more consolidated Pleistocene sediments, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil behaviour can be highly influenced by depositional and post‐depositional processes (Truong et al ., 2011; Sarti et al ., 2012). As different facies have distinct geotechnical and geomechanical characteristics (Truong et al ., 2013; Lorenzo et al ., 2014), facies characterization through CPTU could be utilized to make predictions about the 3D spatial distribution of geomechanically ‘weak’ versus ‘strong’ deposits, aside from any specific geographic location. Through the analysis of CPTU profiles, for example, soft, unconsolidated Holocene deposits with low Qc and Fs can be easily distinguished from stiff (high Qc and Fs) and more consolidated Pleistocene sediments, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%