2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67774-3_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Late Paleogene to Neogene Volcanic Arc in the Southern Central Andes (28°–37° S)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foreland quiescence marks a ~20 Myr pause in retroarc shortening and is synchronous with upper crustal extension within the thrust belt and broader magmatic arc (Principal Cordillera), as recorded by late middle Eocene‐early Miocene growth of the Loncopué, Cura‐Mallín, and Abanico extensional basins (Burns et al, ; Charrier et al, , ; Folguera et al, ; Godoy et al, ; Jordan et al, ; Ramos & Folguera, ; Rojas Vera et al, , ). This sustained period with no significant retroarc shortening and broad intraorogenic extension appears to have affected much of the transitional zone from the central to southern Andes, from at least 28°S to 40°S (Charrier et al, ; Jordan et al, ; Litvak et al, , ; Winocur et al, ). At this time, the magmatic arc remained relative fixed or possibly retreated westward to the Principal Cordillera/Central Valley boundary (Charrier et al, ).…”
Section: Central To Southern Andes Transition (35°s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreland quiescence marks a ~20 Myr pause in retroarc shortening and is synchronous with upper crustal extension within the thrust belt and broader magmatic arc (Principal Cordillera), as recorded by late middle Eocene‐early Miocene growth of the Loncopué, Cura‐Mallín, and Abanico extensional basins (Burns et al, ; Charrier et al, , ; Folguera et al, ; Godoy et al, ; Jordan et al, ; Ramos & Folguera, ; Rojas Vera et al, , ). This sustained period with no significant retroarc shortening and broad intraorogenic extension appears to have affected much of the transitional zone from the central to southern Andes, from at least 28°S to 40°S (Charrier et al, ; Jordan et al, ; Litvak et al, , ; Winocur et al, ). At this time, the magmatic arc remained relative fixed or possibly retreated westward to the Principal Cordillera/Central Valley boundary (Charrier et al, ).…”
Section: Central To Southern Andes Transition (35°s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red to yellow indicates the change from thin to thick-skinned foreland deformation (Ramos et al, 2002). Rotation symbols indicate crustal rotation based on paleomagnetic data (Japas et al, 2016), red triangles indicate volcanic events events (Trumbull et al, 2006;Litvak et al, 2018;Quiero et al, 2022). S1, S2, S3 hold for identified stages of propagation of the deformation to the east.…”
Section: Regional Setting Of the Southern Central Andesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8F and 9A; Kay and Mpodozis, 2002;Jones et al, 2016). Oligocene volcanic rocks yielded geochemical signatures characteristic of partial melting of mantle wedge material (Kay and Abbruzzi, 1996;Jones et al, 2016;Litvak et al, 2018) and were associated with intra-arc oblique faulting (Piquer et al, 2017;Mosolf et al, 2019;Mackaman-Lofland et al, 2019). Middle Miocene arc volcanism was defined by isotopic signatures indicative of crustal thickening (>50 km; Kay et al, 1991;Jones et al, 2015).…”
Section: Oligocene-pliocenementioning
confidence: 99%