2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Late Neandertal permanent lower left third premolar from Walou Cave (Trooz, Belgium) and its context

Abstract: We discuss the implications of the existence of a clearly Neandertal premolar dating to the period of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Meuse river basin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The configurations of landmarks and semilandmarks described in G omez-Robles et al (G omez-Robles et al, 2007;G omez-Robles et al, 2008) were digitized on occlusal projections of the 3D models of the Lezetxiki teeth. These teeth were compared with the Neanderthal and modern human samples (including both fossil and recent modern humans) analyzed in these and other later studies (Becam et al, 2019;G omez-Robles et al, 2007G omez-Robles et al, , 2008Toussaint et al, 2018). Major patterns of variation were summarized through principal components analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Geometric Morphometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The configurations of landmarks and semilandmarks described in G omez-Robles et al (G omez-Robles et al, 2007;G omez-Robles et al, 2008) were digitized on occlusal projections of the 3D models of the Lezetxiki teeth. These teeth were compared with the Neanderthal and modern human samples (including both fossil and recent modern humans) analyzed in these and other later studies (Becam et al, 2019;G omez-Robles et al, 2007G omez-Robles et al, , 2008Toussaint et al, 2018). Major patterns of variation were summarized through principal components analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Geometric Morphometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the data from cycles A and B are from (Dewez 1993). CAP, climatic amelioration phases; GA, green amphibole content (%) from heavy minerals of the silt fraction (see Pirson et al 2011a); Palynology, synthesis of the palynological record (see Damblon et al 2011); Anthraco., anthracology (Damblon 2011); Small mammals, synthesis of palaeoecological signatures inferred from macrofaunal assemblages (Cordy 1991(Cordy , 1993Turmes 1996;Stewart and Parfitt 2011); Archaeo./Anthropo., archaeological assemblages identified in the sequence (see Draily 2011a) and position of the Neanderthal tooth (Toussaint et al 2017); Dates, the dates mentioned are uncalibrated 14 C dates, with the four new radiocarbon determinations in bold blue (see Pirson et al 2011b and this paper;Higham et al 2014), except for two ESR/U-Th dates on animal teeth (Pirouelle in Draily et al 2011) and four TL dates on burnt limestone for which the mean is given here (Debenham in Draily et al 2011); Chronostratigraphy, chronostratigraphic interpretation based on all available disciplines (see Pirson 2011;Pirson et al 2006Pirson et al , 2011a; MIS, proposed correlation with marine oxygen isotopic stages the 1985-1990 fieldwork, the Gravettian layer was excavated over 38 m 2 in zone 1, 8 m 2 in zone 2 and 3 m 2 in zone 3. The excavated surface for the Gravettian layer in 1996-2004 totals 3 m 2 in zone 1 only.…”
Section: Lithic Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, for teeth for which fragments have been glued back together, and/or which were sampled for destructive biochemical analysis (e.g., the Neanderthal Walou tooth, see Fig. S4 in Toussaint et al, ) or restored with dental composite (e.g., the incisor of the Ehringsdorf G2 Neanderthal child, see Fig. in Le Cabec & Toussaint, ), such alterations may not be immediately evident to the naked eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%