2015
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2014.956877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The late Eocene–early Oligocene ichthyofauna from the Eastend area of the Cypress Hills Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada

Abstract: The Eocene through Miocene Cypress Hills Formation of Saskatchewan and Alberta has been the basis of studies on sedimentology, paleobotany, herpetofauna, avifauna, and mammalian local faunas. We describe the ichthyofauna from the Eastend area of the formation, representing late Eocene Chadronian to early Oligocene Whitneyan deposits. This fauna is diverse, including at least 14 fish taxa: Lepisosteus, Amiinae, aff. Hiodon, at least three cypriniforms among which is a Ptychocheilus-like leuciscine and at least … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimens were obtained through sediment sifting of samples collected in 2003 and stored at the fossil collection of the Centro de Pesquisa de História Natural e Arqueologia do Maranhão (CPHNAMA), where they were registered as VT-1541 (teeth) and VT-1540 (vertebrae). Their descriptions were based on Grande (2010) monography; and Divay & Murray (2015), which pertain to details of the vertebrae neural and haemal arches, with some nomenclatural differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specimens were obtained through sediment sifting of samples collected in 2003 and stored at the fossil collection of the Centro de Pesquisa de História Natural e Arqueologia do Maranhão (CPHNAMA), where they were registered as VT-1541 (teeth) and VT-1540 (vertebrae). Their descriptions were based on Grande (2010) monography; and Divay & Murray (2015), which pertain to details of the vertebrae neural and haemal arches, with some nomenclatural differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolated materials such as scales and teeth represent the most common fossil remains of gars, and in addition to the few lepisosteoid vertebrae, they provide an important record favoring the understanding of the historic distribution of the group (Moody & Sutcliffe, 1991;Gottfried & Krause, 1998;Kear et al, 2009;Divay & Murray, 2015;Martinelli & Teixeira, 2015;Pérez-García et al, 2016;Szabó et al, 2016;Alves et al, 2020;Kovalchuk & Anfimova, 2020). The vertebrae with opisthocoelous centra and teeth with plicidentine are useful for identifying fragmentary fossil specimens, once they are diagnostic for Lepisosteoidea and Lepisosteidae, respectively (Grande, 2010;López-Arbarello, 2012).…”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%