The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2015
DOI: 10.7183/1045-6635.26.4.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Last Groups Standing: Living Abandonment at the Ancient Maya Center of Minanha, Belize

Abstract: The most archaeologically visible dimension of the Classic Maya Collapse is the abandonment of monumental royal courts. Yet, in some cases, non-elite populations lived for centuries in and around Classic Maya centers without rulers. Processes of abandonment among Classic Maya commoners are detectable and reflect their own ritual and social practices divorced from the ritual performances undertaken by the ruling elite. We study the abandonment context and chronology of three domestic groups from the Contreras V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for termination, whether reverential or desecratory, may affect the conditions of the objects. Desecratory termination may incorporate the destruction of locations by burning or damaging architectural features and/or burials, possibly associated with defeat in warfare (Demarest et al 1997;Garber 1983;Golden et al 2016;Harrison-Buck 2012, 2016Harrison-Buck et al 2007; Iannone 2005Iannone , 2010Inomata 2003Inomata , 2016Lamoureux-St-Hilaire et al 2015;Mock 1998b;Pagliaro et al 2003;Palka 2003;Schwake and Iannone 2016;Suhler and Freidel 2003;Yaeger 2010). Whether the product of desecratory or reverential termination, the conditions of the objects in problematic deposits can vary, with some being damaged or broken, conceivably on purpose, to "kill" them or remove their life-force (see Walker [1995] for "kratophanous material culture").…”
Section: What Is a Problematic Deposit?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for termination, whether reverential or desecratory, may affect the conditions of the objects. Desecratory termination may incorporate the destruction of locations by burning or damaging architectural features and/or burials, possibly associated with defeat in warfare (Demarest et al 1997;Garber 1983;Golden et al 2016;Harrison-Buck 2012, 2016Harrison-Buck et al 2007; Iannone 2005Iannone , 2010Inomata 2003Inomata , 2016Lamoureux-St-Hilaire et al 2015;Mock 1998b;Pagliaro et al 2003;Palka 2003;Schwake and Iannone 2016;Suhler and Freidel 2003;Yaeger 2010). Whether the product of desecratory or reverential termination, the conditions of the objects in problematic deposits can vary, with some being damaged or broken, conceivably on purpose, to "kill" them or remove their life-force (see Walker [1995] for "kratophanous material culture").…”
Section: What Is a Problematic Deposit?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, many abandoned Preclassic and Classic period centres became pilgrimage destinations (Andres & Pyburn 2004;Brown 2011;Hansen et al 2008;Robin et al 2012). Where populations dwelled amongst the monumental ruins, they continued to interact with the past on a daily basis (Halperin 2014;Lamoureux-St-Hilaire et al 2015;Mixter 2017a;Navarro-Farr 2016). Perhaps because of their association with transcendent cosmological concepts, triadic pyramid groups in particular remained places of reverence (Halperin 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable doubt has justifiably been raised about the ceremonial significance of exposed offerings . We argue that, to be most convincing, termination rituals should be associated with structural primary deposits, tying all offerings within a localized ritual cycle (Lamoureux-St-Hilaire et al 2015).…”
Section: Gradual and Organized Abandonment-ritualmentioning
confidence: 91%