“…Previous references to the size of D. terrelli are not based on quantitative approaches ( Denison, 1978 ; Frickhinger, 1995 ; Anderson & Westneat, 2007 ; Anderson & Westneat, 2009 ; Albert, Johnson & Knouft, 2009 ; Carr, 2010 ; Long, 2010 ) and some of them are probably overestimates (e.g., 10 m in Anderson & Westneat, 2009 ). Size estimations of other big placoderms have been founded on corporal proportions of Coccosteus , extrapolating the ratio between some shield measurements and total body length calculated in complete specimens of this species (e.g., Gross, 1960 ; Young, 2005 ; Vaškaninová & Kraft, 2014 ). However, the reliability of such approximations should be questioned since the obtained estimates are too far from the usual range of lengths of Coccosteus cuspidatus (one order of magnitude higher) and the presence of allometry has been documented many times in some shield plates of different species (e.g., Werdelin & Long, 1986 ; Zhu & Janvier, 1996 ; Trinajstic & McNamara, 1999 ; Trinajstic & Hazelton, 2007 ; Olive et al, 2014 ), including C. cuspidatus itself ( Miles & Westoll, 1968 ).…”