“…It follows readily from Theorem 5.2 in Arcones [1]. (This same method is used for the proof of Prop.…”
Section: Preliminary Factsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lévy [8] For each Λ > 0 E Λ collects the exceptional points in [0,1] where the law of the iterated logarithm (1.2) fails. Orey and Taylor [11] showed that, with probability 1, E Λ is a random fractal with Hausdorff dimension, given by…”
Abstract.In this paper, we extend the results of Orey and Taylor [S. Orey and S.J. Taylor, How often on a Brownian path does the law of the iterated logarithm fail? Proc. London Math. Soc. 28 (1974) 174-192] relative to random fractals generated by oscillations of Wiener processes to a multivariate framework. We consider a setup where Gaussian processes are indexed by classes of functions.Mathematics Subject Classification. 60J65, 28A80.
“…It follows readily from Theorem 5.2 in Arcones [1]. (This same method is used for the proof of Prop.…”
Section: Preliminary Factsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lévy [8] For each Λ > 0 E Λ collects the exceptional points in [0,1] where the law of the iterated logarithm (1.2) fails. Orey and Taylor [11] showed that, with probability 1, E Λ is a random fractal with Hausdorff dimension, given by…”
Abstract.In this paper, we extend the results of Orey and Taylor [S. Orey and S.J. Taylor, How often on a Brownian path does the law of the iterated logarithm fail? Proc. London Math. Soc. 28 (1974) 174-192] relative to random fractals generated by oscillations of Wiener processes to a multivariate framework. We consider a setup where Gaussian processes are indexed by classes of functions.Mathematics Subject Classification. 60J65, 28A80.
“…Hence, following the ideas already indicated in [10] and [2], we symmetrize the X i : introduce an i.i.d. sequence (X i ) i∈N which is also independent of (X i ) i∈N and such that L(X 1 ) = L(X 1 ).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here -for all such sequences (b n ) n -the rate functions are given by I(t) = 1 2 Var X1 t 2 and the speed is a n = b 2 n /n. In a recent paper [2] Arcones states that assumption (2.3) below is necessary and sufficient for 1 bn n i=1 (X i − EX i ) to satisfy a moderate deviations principle. As a matter of fact it seems that the search for such an equivalent condition is almost as old as the investigation of moderate deviations for means of i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, already Ledoux [9] discusses the connection of our assumption (2.3) below with the moderate deviations upper bound for a restricted range of normalizations (b n ). Unfortunately, Arcones proof in [2] of this interesting equivalence is spread over several theorems and articles and technically very involved, since it relies on MDPs for Banach space valued stochastic processes. Moreover it is most unfortunately spoiled by several flaws and therefore hardly penetrable.…”
Abstract. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a sum of i.i.d. random variablesXi/bn -where bn n ↓ 0, but bn √ n ↑ ∞ -to satisfy a moderate deviations principle. Moreover we show that this equivalence is a typical moderate deviations phenomenon. It is not true in a large deviations regime.Mathematics Subject Classification. 60F10.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.