2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9sm02242b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Laplace approach in microrheology

Abstract: Use of the Fourier transform in the generalized Stokes–Einstein relation for micro-rheological analysis can give different results from the direct inverse Laplace approach. The latter gives better agreement with bulk rheology and should be preferred.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This connection can be made using the generalized Stokes–Einstein equation (GSE), which relates the Laplace transform of the macroscopic modulus, G̃ ( s ), to the unilateral Laplace transform of the mean square displacements of Brownian tracers of radius R embedded in a viscoelastic matrix, ⟨Δ r̃ 2 ( s )⟩: . , Here, we consider that the tracers are the reactive units ( R = 0.5σ LJ ). A direct numerical transform of the time-domain data to the frequency domain is generally unreliable and different methods to convert real-time data to frequency data have been proposed. , Here, we implement the so-called Fourier microrheology method developed by Mason . This method is subject to approximations that are detailed in Supporting Information SI1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This connection can be made using the generalized Stokes–Einstein equation (GSE), which relates the Laplace transform of the macroscopic modulus, G̃ ( s ), to the unilateral Laplace transform of the mean square displacements of Brownian tracers of radius R embedded in a viscoelastic matrix, ⟨Δ r̃ 2 ( s )⟩: . , Here, we consider that the tracers are the reactive units ( R = 0.5σ LJ ). A direct numerical transform of the time-domain data to the frequency domain is generally unreliable and different methods to convert real-time data to frequency data have been proposed. , Here, we implement the so-called Fourier microrheology method developed by Mason . This method is subject to approximations that are detailed in Supporting Information SI1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct numerical transform of the time-domain data to the frequency domain is generally unreliable and different methods to convert real-time data to frequency data have been proposed. 52,54 Here, we implement the so-called Fourier microrheology method developed by Mason. 55 This method is subject to approximations that are detailed in Supporting Information SI1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GSER above can be extended by making an analytic continuation ( s = iω ) and taking a Fourier transformation to obtain the complex modulus G *­(ω): where is the Fourier transformed MSD as a function of time t . The time-domain response of the material can also be calculated using a Laplace transformation by invoking the continuum viscoelastic identity in Laplace space sJ̃ ( s ) G̃ ( s ) to extract the compliance J ( t ): which is directly proportional to the mean-square displacement. The compliance J ( t ), as well as storage ( G ′) and loss ( G ″ ) moduli calculated from G *­(ω), can be directly compared with macrorheology (section ).…”
Section: Network Mechanics and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear moduli can also be solved in the Laplace domain ( Mason et al, 1997a ; Mason et al, 1997b ; Xu et al, 1998 ; Winter and Mours, 2006 ). Li et al compared the accuracy of results determined by different approaches ( Li et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Microrheological Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%