1994
DOI: 10.1080/02687039408248638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The language production system and senile dementia of Alzheimer's type: Neuropathological implications

Abstract: Lexical encoding-retrieval processes in sentence production and semanticpragmatic relevance in discourse and specified as deficits in language processing in the early phase of senile dementia of Alzheimer's type (SDAT). Research on language processing in ageing and neurolinguistic architecture is combined in order to develop a framework for further research which can indicate a link between deterioration in language processing and progress in neuropathology in SDAT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The individuals in our study produced phonological paraphasias, false-start errors, and perseverations, and a number also showed the effortful, hesitant speech characteristic of the nonfluent aphasias. This is contrary to claims that phonological processing and phonetic articulation are preserved until the late stages of the disease (Cohn et al, 1991;Patel & Satz, 1994). Given that articulatory and/or phonological disruption appear to be relatively rare in DAT, it is possible that some studies reporting intact speech production have happened not to enroll patients with these disruptions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The individuals in our study produced phonological paraphasias, false-start errors, and perseverations, and a number also showed the effortful, hesitant speech characteristic of the nonfluent aphasias. This is contrary to claims that phonological processing and phonetic articulation are preserved until the late stages of the disease (Cohn et al, 1991;Patel & Satz, 1994). Given that articulatory and/or phonological disruption appear to be relatively rare in DAT, it is possible that some studies reporting intact speech production have happened not to enroll patients with these disruptions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This finding argues against the presumed preservation of morpho-syntactic features of language in AD (Forbes et al, 2002;Glosser & Deser, 1991;Patel & Satz, 1994) and is in keeping with a degree of multi-modal language impairment in this group of patients. Altmann and colleagues have previously reported a similar finding in a cohort of probable AD patients (Altmann, Kempler, & Andersen, 2001).…”
Section: Clinical Comparison Of Connected Speechmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…Bayles and Kaszniak [46] concluded that phonologic knowledge can be applied by Alzheimer patients who are incapable of meaningful communication. And in a study of phonologic function in mild late-onset DAT patients, Patel and Satz [54] concluded that there were no deficits in sound combination, stress, and general rhythm of sounds. Further, Patel and Satz [54] concluded that phonologic preservation in early-onset DAT applied also to spelling; early-onset patients were able to sound out and spell words they could no longer assign meaning to.…”
Section: Phonologic Impairment In Datmentioning
confidence: 99%