2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The language of psychopaths: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the discourse of psychopathic offenders appeared less coherent (due to the increased usage of filler words) than that of other offenders (consistent with findings by Brinkley et al, 1999;Williamson, 1991), contained more pronouns relating to the self (for similar findings, see Hancock et al, 2015), and contained fewer references to others (comparable with results found by Hancock et al, 2013). Some past research has found that psychopaths are capable of formulating and using verbal and written language according to phonological, syntactic, morphological, and semantic rules (Brites, Ladera, Perea, & Garcia, 2014), and recognizing the internal structure of words and their principles (Brites, 2016). However, although we did not include formal analyses of grammatical content and structure, our findings provide support for the other clinical impressions and previous empirical evidence that psychopathic language often lacks cohesion (Brinkley et al, 1999;Cleckley, 1976;Hare, 1999;Williamson, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, the discourse of psychopathic offenders appeared less coherent (due to the increased usage of filler words) than that of other offenders (consistent with findings by Brinkley et al, 1999;Williamson, 1991), contained more pronouns relating to the self (for similar findings, see Hancock et al, 2015), and contained fewer references to others (comparable with results found by Hancock et al, 2013). Some past research has found that psychopaths are capable of formulating and using verbal and written language according to phonological, syntactic, morphological, and semantic rules (Brites, Ladera, Perea, & Garcia, 2014), and recognizing the internal structure of words and their principles (Brites, 2016). However, although we did not include formal analyses of grammatical content and structure, our findings provide support for the other clinical impressions and previous empirical evidence that psychopathic language often lacks cohesion (Brinkley et al, 1999;Cleckley, 1976;Hare, 1999;Williamson, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Some past research has found that psychopaths are capable of formulating and using verbal and written language according to phonological, syntactic, morphological, and semantic rules (Brites, Ladera, Perea, & Garcia, 2014), and recognizing the internal structure of words and their principles (Brites, 2016). However, although we did not include formal analyses of grammatical content and structure, our findings provide support for the other clinical impressions and previous empirical evidence that psychopathic language often lacks cohesion (Brinkley et al, 1999; Cleckley, 1976; Hare, 1999; Williamson, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brites et al (2015) found that psychopaths know phonological, syntactic, morphological, and semantic rules of verbal and written language. They recognize word structure and its principles, as well as phonetic and morphological features (Brites, 2016). Brites (2016) concludes that psychopaths' language has an adaptive value and reflects the main characteristics of their personality.…”
Section: Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They recognize word structure and its principles, as well as phonetic and morphological features (Brites, 2016). Brites (2016) concludes that psychopaths' language has an adaptive value and reflects the main characteristics of their personality.…”
Section: Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, these researchers recommended that future studies examine the speech characteristics of people with psychopathy, both for emotional and for unemotional events. In their opinion, participants' responses to emotional stimuli had to be considered both objectively and subjectively [23,24].…”
Section: Psychopathy and Languagementioning
confidence: 99%