“…In summary, the discourse of psychopathic offenders appeared less coherent (due to the increased usage of filler words) than that of other offenders (consistent with findings by Brinkley et al, 1999;Williamson, 1991), contained more pronouns relating to the self (for similar findings, see Hancock et al, 2015), and contained fewer references to others (comparable with results found by Hancock et al, 2013). Some past research has found that psychopaths are capable of formulating and using verbal and written language according to phonological, syntactic, morphological, and semantic rules (Brites, Ladera, Perea, & Garcia, 2014), and recognizing the internal structure of words and their principles (Brites, 2016). However, although we did not include formal analyses of grammatical content and structure, our findings provide support for the other clinical impressions and previous empirical evidence that psychopathic language often lacks cohesion (Brinkley et al, 1999;Cleckley, 1976;Hare, 1999;Williamson, 1991).…”