2020
DOI: 10.1108/sl-05-2020-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The language of leadership in a deadly pandemic

Abstract: This article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) and any reuse must be in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of the management and governance of the COVID-19 pandemic, the so-called high-performing leaders – including but not limited to Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand, Mette Frederiksen of Denmark, Scott Morrison of Australia and Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan (The Guardian, 2020; Chater, 2020; Pang, 2021) have been compared to their so-called low-performing counterparts – including, but not limited to, the then US president, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and the UK prime minister Boris Johnson (Craig and Amernic, 2020; Independent, 2020; Ladkin, 2020; Pollock and Steen, 2021; Gottlieb, 2021), mainly on the basis of the former’s ability to understand and implement the precautionary principle, particularly at the early stages of the pandemic. Specifically, these high-performing groups were credited for adopting a precautionary strategy – a “worst-case scenario” approach – that allowed them to immediately impose full national lockdowns, including enforcing the closure of schools, gyms, markets and national borders as early as March 2020 (The Guardian, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of the management and governance of the COVID-19 pandemic, the so-called high-performing leaders – including but not limited to Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand, Mette Frederiksen of Denmark, Scott Morrison of Australia and Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan (The Guardian, 2020; Chater, 2020; Pang, 2021) have been compared to their so-called low-performing counterparts – including, but not limited to, the then US president, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and the UK prime minister Boris Johnson (Craig and Amernic, 2020; Independent, 2020; Ladkin, 2020; Pollock and Steen, 2021; Gottlieb, 2021), mainly on the basis of the former’s ability to understand and implement the precautionary principle, particularly at the early stages of the pandemic. Specifically, these high-performing groups were credited for adopting a precautionary strategy – a “worst-case scenario” approach – that allowed them to immediately impose full national lockdowns, including enforcing the closure of schools, gyms, markets and national borders as early as March 2020 (The Guardian, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craig [23] analyzed the language of leadership in such a deadly COVID-19 pandemic. The authors discussed the politics of pandemic speech and stated that when leaders do not know what they do not know, the risk of pretending to be knowledgeable ramps up communication in a crisis.…”
Section: Leadership In Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors discussed the politics of pandemic speech and stated that when leaders do not know what they do not know, the risk of pretending to be knowledgeable ramps up communication in a crisis. Leaders should consider a message that can be inferred from their words and not use intemperate language during a crisis [23].…”
Section: Leadership In Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, most of these studies are snapshots in time and focus on macro-level research, and only a few have explored how leaders and managers in the hotel industry are managing the crisis-e.g., their strategies and actions over time [11]. Interestingly, researchers have discussed that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leadership theory and practice is also in crisis [13][14][15] and challenges existing business research [16]. This is because existing leadership theories offer little help when analyzing environments of uncertainty-e.g., crisis or disaster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%