2015
DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20150723-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Language of Delirium: Keywords for Identifying Delirium from Medical Records

Abstract: Background Electronic medical records (EMRs) offer the potential opportunity to streamline the search for patients with possible delirium. However, the identification of key words is a necessary first step in the effective and systematic use of EMRs for both clinical and research purposes. Objective To identify words and phrases commonly noted in charts of patients with delirium. Design, Setting, and Participants Participants were 67 patients aged 70+ undergoing major elective surgery with evidence of conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a validated chart review method to identify delirium (26, 27). We defined delirium if a physicians’ note contained the terms “delirium”, “delirious” or “CAM positive”, or if the patient received antipsychotics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a validated chart review method to identify delirium (26, 27). We defined delirium if a physicians’ note contained the terms “delirium”, “delirious” or “CAM positive”, or if the patient received antipsychotics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this study may not have captured all patients with a diagnosis of delirium. According to literature, 13 fewer than 3% of delirium cases are coded in the medical record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haematologists may not be recognising or documenting all cases of delirium, as demonstrated in studies of oncology patients . Documentation and subsequent coding of delirium are often inconsistent .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%