2007
DOI: 10.1101/gr.5704207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The landscape of histone modifications across 1% of the human genome in five human cell lines

Abstract: We generated high-resolution maps of histone H3 lysine 9/14 acetylation (H3ac), histone H4 lysine 5/8/12/16 acetylation (H4ac), and histone H3 at lysine 4 mono-, di-, and trimethylation (H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, respectively) across the ENCODE regions. Studying each modification in five human cell lines including the ENCODE Consortium common cell lines GM06990 (lymphoblastoid) and HeLa-S3, as well as K562, HFL-1, and MOLT4, we identified clear patterns of histone modification profiles with respect to genomic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
333
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
21
333
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from visual inspection of the plots shown in Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 1 that using a slightly lower cutoff threshold would have resulted in much greater concordance of domains between cell types. Hidden Markov model (HMM) algorithms are routinely used for detecting chromatin domains in binding data [2][3][4] , primarily because they do not rely on user-defined parameters and are therefore more objective. Similar to the binary classification (LOCK or not LOCK) that Wen et al applied, we applied a two-state HMM to the original datasets.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from visual inspection of the plots shown in Figure 1 and Supplementary Figure 1 that using a slightly lower cutoff threshold would have resulted in much greater concordance of domains between cell types. Hidden Markov model (HMM) algorithms are routinely used for detecting chromatin domains in binding data [2][3][4] , primarily because they do not rely on user-defined parameters and are therefore more objective. Similar to the binary classification (LOCK or not LOCK) that Wen et al applied, we applied a two-state HMM to the original datasets.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly half the DMRs contained at least one ENCODE feature ( Figure 3a). Histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3), a chromatin modification enriched in gene promoters and most often associated with euchromatin and active transcription 26 , and DNase I hypersensitivity sites (DHSs) which are associated with many cis-regulatory elements including promoters, enhancers, insulators, silencers and locus control regions 27 , overlapped most frequently with the DMRs (Figure 3b). Both features overlapped with 22.6% of DMRs.…”
Section: Functional Relevance Of Dmrs Derived From Encode Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed essentially as described by Kock et al, 2007 76 . Briefly, HEL cells (1 x 10 8 ) were grown in RPMI, 10 % FBS to 70 % confluency and collected by centrifugation at 2,000 g for 5 min at 4 o C, washed twice in ice-cold PBS and resuspended in 50 ml serumfree RPMI.…”
Section: Chip Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%