1966
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(66)90034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The laminar boundary layer with arbitrarily distributed mass transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the derivative of that sum with respect to AX, equating to zero, and solving for AX we find ZZ X Z'Z\ (Z\) 2 (A6)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking the derivative of that sum with respect to AX, equating to zero, and solving for AX we find ZZ X Z'Z\ (Z\) 2 (A6)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinates x and y are along and normal to the surface, and u and v are the respective velocity components. If the tracer is introduced as an impurity in the ablation material over the interva Xi < x < x h as a constant mass fraction </> of the ablating material, the conservation of species at the solid surface gives as the boundary conditions = (C -<t>)(pv) w , y = 0, Xi < x < x h (2) and P D(<)C/<)y) = C(pv) v , y = 0, x h < x (3) The remaining initial and boundary conditions imposed on the solution are that there is no seedant upstream of Xi; hence C(x,y) = 0 i < X (4) and at the outer edge of the boundary layer the concentration also vanishes, C(*,co) = 0 (5) The quantity (pv) w is the mass transfer rate on the surface y = 0 and this is considered to be known.…”
Section: The Diffusion Equation For a Chemically Inert Species Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present analysis adopts the Blasius-perturbation approach developed by Libby and Fox E5J, which has been successfully applied to a variety of laminar boundary layer problems with surface chemical reactions or ablations [6,7,8]. One of the characteristics of the present problem is that the Schmidt number involved is very large.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%