2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2008.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lake Michigan contaminant transport and fate model, LM2-toxic: Development, overview, and application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the value 0.52 ± 0.16 m d –1 , which was taken from previous sediment trap measurements in the upper 35 m of the water column of Lake Michigan . This value is similar to the particulate organic carbon settling velocity (0.5 m d –1 ) . Apparent settling velocities of 0.3–0.8 m d –1 are typical for large lakes …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We used the value 0.52 ± 0.16 m d –1 , which was taken from previous sediment trap measurements in the upper 35 m of the water column of Lake Michigan . This value is similar to the particulate organic carbon settling velocity (0.5 m d –1 ) . Apparent settling velocities of 0.3–0.8 m d –1 are typical for large lakes …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, even considering all of the factors mentioned above, it is reasonable to conclude that the decrease in the atmospheric flow is well outside the uncertainty of these calculations, and the half-life of atmospheric flows (combination of dry and wet deposition) is about 6 years ( R 2 = 0.97, p = 0.11) based on first order kinetics. This half-life is the same of that predicted by LM2 model under the fast recovery scenario …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations