2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Laffer curve revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
337
3
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
25
337
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The constant fraction of public spending g financed by current taxes is calibrated so as to match g/y = 0.15. Steady state taxes are set to τ c = 0.05 and τ n = 0.28 which are values calculated for the U.S. by Trabandt and Uhlig (2011). The steady state level of the hiring subsidy is set to τ k = 0.01.…”
Section: Calibration and Quantitative Properties Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant fraction of public spending g financed by current taxes is calibrated so as to match g/y = 0.15. Steady state taxes are set to τ c = 0.05 and τ n = 0.28 which are values calculated for the U.S. by Trabandt and Uhlig (2011). The steady state level of the hiring subsidy is set to τ k = 0.01.…”
Section: Calibration and Quantitative Properties Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the tax rates (aggregated to annual levels) in comparison to the annual effective tax rates constructed by Mendoza et al (1994) and Trabandt and Uhlig (2011). The series constructed here are very close to the most recent data of Trabandt and Uhlig (2011) and also fit the overall movement of the Mendoza et al (1994) data. Figure 7 shows the quarterly effective tax rates used in the estimation.…”
Section: Constructing Effective Tax Ratesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The profiles of γ t−v and δ h t−v are illustrated in the right-hand panel of Figure 1. We set the capital share of output (ε k ) equal to 0.38 as suggested by Trabandt and Uhlig (2011). The depreciation rate of physical capital (δ k ) equals 0.08 and we normalize the aggregate level of productivity (Ω) to unity.…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%