2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.887100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Laffer Curve of Macroeconomic Volatility and Growth: Can it be Explained by the Different Nature of Crises?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their overall conclusion is that proper attention needs to be paid to the consequences of regime switches; otherwise, the models would seriously underestimate both the degree of uncertainty of inflation and its impact. In the same line, Henry and Olekalns (), García‐Herrero and Vilarrubia (), and Andraz and Norte () have shown that real uncertainty affects output growth differently in different output growth regimes which are characterized by expansion and contraction…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Their overall conclusion is that proper attention needs to be paid to the consequences of regime switches; otherwise, the models would seriously underestimate both the degree of uncertainty of inflation and its impact. In the same line, Henry and Olekalns (), García‐Herrero and Vilarrubia (), and Andraz and Norte () have shown that real uncertainty affects output growth differently in different output growth regimes which are characterized by expansion and contraction…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…They attribute these findings to the lack of stabilization policies, institutional safeguards, and insurance markets in less advanced nations that would allow them to neutralize the long-run effects of volatility. A different view is offered by Herrero and Vilarrubia (2005) who offer support to an inverted U-shaped relationship between real volatility and growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, recent studies (Bhar and Hamori (2004), Chang (2012) and Chowdhury and Sarkar (2015), Chang and He (2010), Chen, Shen, and Xie (2008), Evans (1991), Evans and Wachtel (1993)) have emphasized the importance of incorporating regime switching behaviour of inflation while studying the relationship between inflation and inflation uncertainty. In the same line, Andraz and Norte (2013), Garcia‐Herrero and Vilarrubia (2007), Henry and Olekalns (2002), Chowdhury and Sarkar (2018) have examined the linkages between output growth and real uncertainty in different phases of economic growth. These studies stressed on the importance of the state of the economy while analysing the linkages between macroeconomic performances and their uncertainties.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%