The lacuna of capital, the state and war? The lost global history and theory of Eastern agency

Abstract

In this article I seek to constructively engage Alex Anievas's seminal book that is deservedly the subject of this forum. For Anievas has become a key figure in the revival of Trotskyism in IR and his is one of the first book-length treatments of the New Trotskyist theory of the international. My critique is meant merely as a constructive effort to push his excellent scholarship further in terms of developing his non-Eurocentric approach. In the first section I argue that his book represents a giant leap forward for the New Trotskyist IR. However, in the following sections I argue that although undeniably a brave attempt nevertheless, in the last instance, Anievas falls a few steps short in realising a genuinely non-Eurocentric account of world politics. This is because while he certainly restores or brings in 'the lost theory and history of IR' that elevates class forces to a 2 central role in shaping world politics, nevertheless he fails to bring in 'the lost global theory and history of Eastern agency' that constitutes, in my view, the key ingredient of a non-Eurocentric approach to world politics. I also argue that while his anti-reductionist ontological credentials are for the most part extremely impressive, nevertheless, I argue that these are compromised in his analysis of Hitler's racism. Finally, in the conclusion I ask whether the theoretical architecture of the New Trotskyism in IR is capable of developing a non-Eurocentric approach before concluding in the affirmative with respect to its modern revisionist incarnation of which Anievas is in the vanguard.

Geoculture and unevenness: Occidentalism in the history of uneven and combined development

“…Given this staunch materialism, it is perhaps unsurprising that there have been relatively few attempts to grapple with the cultural dimensions of unevenness. Indeed, UCD's critics have tended to label it a kind of economic reductionism blind to the significance of culture and ideas (Hobson 2007(Hobson , 2016. What, then, is its relevance for the study of cultural change?…”