EXCLI Journal; 20:Doc1431; ISSN 1611-2156 2021
DOI: 10.17179/excli2021-4072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The laboratory rat: age and body weight matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, species difference is a factor that may explain some inconsistent findings in the field. Rodents are the most common species used in animal experiments (Ghasemi et al, 2021[ 28 ]). In rats, NO production rate is similar to humans (0.55 ± 0.05 vs. 0.38±0.06 μmol.kg -1 .h -1 (Siervo et al, 2011[ 92 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, species difference is a factor that may explain some inconsistent findings in the field. Rodents are the most common species used in animal experiments (Ghasemi et al, 2021[ 28 ]). In rats, NO production rate is similar to humans (0.55 ± 0.05 vs. 0.38±0.06 μmol.kg -1 .h -1 (Siervo et al, 2011[ 92 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With advanced aging, females have a tendency to gain weight and exhibit metabolic dysfunction. In addition, the age and body weight of animals are closely related to changes in the gene expression of metabolic parameters [ 27 ]. Regarding body weight, we found that weight loss was observed in the 10-day-interval group, starting on the first week after multiple cell injections ( Figure 1 c; pink bar vs. violet bar).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tibial length is an indicator of animal size. Since bone growth never stops in rats, normalization of absolute organ weight to tibial length is commonly performed in these animals [ 14 ]. The age effect on the ratio of prostate to tibial length was also evident ( p < 0.0001, Cont2 vs. Cont1 and p < 0.0001, PCa2 vs. PCa1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%