2004
DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2004.9652963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The LAAS: A Computerized Scoring System for Small- and Large-Scale Developmental Assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On Commons' scale, the dominant Stage 17 is systematic-with-some-formal, which fits well with the leader of a system called a nation who expresses ideas logically. Dawson and Wilson (2004) reported the minimum reliability of the computerized scoring system as equivalent to a = .80. Differences between scores of more than 1/3 of a complexity order are statistically meaningful (T. L. Dawson, personal communication, August 5, 2003).…”
Section: Moral Reasoning Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On Commons' scale, the dominant Stage 17 is systematic-with-some-formal, which fits well with the leader of a system called a nation who expresses ideas logically. Dawson and Wilson (2004) reported the minimum reliability of the computerized scoring system as equivalent to a = .80. Differences between scores of more than 1/3 of a complexity order are statistically meaningful (T. L. Dawson, personal communication, August 5, 2003).…”
Section: Moral Reasoning Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expert scorer Dawson, supported by a computerized system for scoring hierarchical complexity (Dawson and Wilson, 2004), was able to score 41 out of the 42 vision statements (Kennedy's Vision 5 was not scored because it did not present a rationale for its asserted solution) and reported the scores shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Moral Reasoning Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fizemos análise qualitativa por sistemas categóricos baseados na Taxonomia SOLO (BIGGS;COLLIS, 1982), nas ferramentas de Lógica de Argumentação -Lectical Assessment System -LAS (DAWSON, 2004), na classificação por conteúdos (RAPPOLT-SCHLICHTMANN et all, 2007), na Teoria de Habilidades Dinâmicas (FISCHER, 2006) e na perspectiva docente de avaliação (AMANTES, 2009). A análise qualitativa também se fez presente para avaliar as situações de ensino, realizada a partir da construção de mapas de episódios.…”
Section: Aspectos Gerais Da Pesquisaunclassified
“…In addition, a different set of methods have produced independent evidence of the same scale of seven levels in Table 8.1. Theo Dawson (Dawson & Wilson, 2004;Dawson-Tunik et al, 2005) pioneered this research, using Rasch analysis to scale item difficulty in extensive data sets based on interviews, standardized tests, essays, and other written materials. Rasch scaling detected exactly the same seven-level scale in these data sets, demonstrating clustering of items by complexity level and gaps along the complexity scale between the clusters.…”
Section: Cycles Of Cognitive Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%