“…According to Watson, he and his NTL colleagues (likely therefore to have included Lippitt) did believe that the T-group, and social/behavioural science per se were truly a vehicle for progressive social change, as well as personal transformation (Watson, 1963;Nicholson, 1997Nicholson, , 1998Cooke, 2005). They may have been naively psychologistic, and mistaken in this respect; but I argue (Cooke, 2005) this aspiration, and its oppositional Cold War significance have yet to be fully acknowledged. Moreover, tactically, Lippitt's 'compliance', if that is what it is, compared to Collier's 'resistance', did at least ensure the survival of action research notwithstanding his, and the RCGD/NTL strand of action researchers', New Deal, progressive associations.…”