2021
DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20200055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study (KPOS): Study Design and Participants

Abstract: Background: The Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study (KPOS) was established to investigate the determinants of adverse pregnancy outcomes among Korean women. Methods: We recruited 4,537 pregnant women between 2013 and 2017 from two tertiary centers located in Seoul, Korea, and a total of 4,195 Korean women met inclusion criteria in the baseline analysis. A range of data on socio-demographics, past medical histories, reproductive information, health-related behaviors, psychological health and clinical information wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used data from the Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study (KPOS), which was a prospective cohort study of pregnant Korean women. A detailed description of the study protocol has been reported elsewhere [ 23 ]. During the baseline examinations conducted from 2013 to 2017, the KPOS study enrolled a total of 4195 women who visited the Cheil General Hospital and CHA Hospital for antenatal care during the first trimester.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used data from the Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study (KPOS), which was a prospective cohort study of pregnant Korean women. A detailed description of the study protocol has been reported elsewhere [ 23 ]. During the baseline examinations conducted from 2013 to 2017, the KPOS study enrolled a total of 4195 women who visited the Cheil General Hospital and CHA Hospital for antenatal care during the first trimester.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NHS3 PPD data (10.3%) suggests similar rates reported for the USA, 13.2% from population-based data 19. However, prior studies only included a subsample of working women, ranging from 52.3%20 to 63.5%18 or did not report on employment status 5 19. While the differing PPD rates may be linked to the wide variation of assessment timepoints, that is, ranging from 2 weeks to within 6 months, average of 4 months for the US data,19 it is possible that the role of employment prior to and in early pregnancy may not have been fully reflected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Compared with prior studies of Korean mothers using the same criterion (EPDS≥10), PPD prevalence from the KNHS data is comparable to a report of 42.5% within 6 months6 while slightly higher than another17 that reported rates of 36.3% and 36.7% at 2 and 6 weeks postpartum, respectively. Using the same criterion, however, the Korean Pregnancy Outcome Study18 analysed women between 2013 and 2017 and reported a lower rate of 16.6% at 6–8 weeks postpartum. The NHS3 PPD data (10.3%) suggests similar rates reported for the USA, 13.2% from population-based data 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no subject with GDM, who has binge drinking status (n = 0). GDM was diagnosed using a two-step method as described in previous study [ 39 ]. Briefly, universal screening with a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) was conducted between 24 and 28 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, modifiable lifestyle factors were classified according to following as: Smoking before and during pregnancy (Former or current, low-risk; None, high-risk) [40][41][42] and Physical activity before and during pregnancy (More than moderate, low-risk; None or light, high-risk); and analyzed their effects on the risk of developing macrosomia by maternal alcohol drinking status. Physical activity before and during pregnancy was queried at the first antenated visit and further asked at each visit for frequency and duration of walking, moderate and vigorous-intensity activity [39]. Based on these questionnaires, physical activity levels were categorized according to the following criteria: None or light in physical activity (almost sedentary lifestyle, office work, and a housewife with few housework, etc.)…”
Section: Definition Of Macrosomia and Its Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%