Abstract:The incidence rate of cervical cancer in Korea is still higher than in other developed countries, notwithstanding the national mass-screening program. Furthermore, a new method has been introduced in cervical cancer screening. Therefore, the committee for cervical cancer screening in Korea updated the recommendation statement established in 2002. The new version of the guideline was developed by the committee using evidence-based methods. The committee reviewed the evidence for the benefits and harms of the Pa… Show more
“…Moreover, in nations where the medical cost of colposcopic examination is low despite high quality control and accuracy, such as Korea, colposcopy for management of such patients might be beneficial. 25 There has been some debate regarding the clinical relevance of using CIN2 as the cut-off in the management of cervical intraepithelial lesions, mainly due to the low reproducibility of histologic diagnosis of CIN2 and relatively high regression rates, especially in young women. 26,27 However, a dichotomous classification comparing <CIN2 to CIN2 was found to be more reproducible than one that compares <CIN3 to CIN3 in a recent study, although an individual finding of CIN2 is less reproducible than one of CIN3.…”
“…Moreover, in nations where the medical cost of colposcopic examination is low despite high quality control and accuracy, such as Korea, colposcopy for management of such patients might be beneficial. 25 There has been some debate regarding the clinical relevance of using CIN2 as the cut-off in the management of cervical intraepithelial lesions, mainly due to the low reproducibility of histologic diagnosis of CIN2 and relatively high regression rates, especially in young women. 26,27 However, a dichotomous classification comparing <CIN2 to CIN2 was found to be more reproducible than one that compares <CIN3 to CIN3 in a recent study, although an individual finding of CIN2 is less reproducible than one of CIN3.…”
“…In Korea, cervical cancer incidence has decreased continuously, largely due to the detection of precursor lesions using the Pap test [ 2 ]. Nevertheless, cervical cancer is still the most common gynecological cancer, and the age-standardized incidence was 9.5 per 100,000 persons in 2013 [ 3 ]. Accordingly, it remains a significant public health concern in Korea.…”
ObjectiveThe rates of participation in the Korean nationwide cervical cancer screening program and the rates of abnormal test results were determined.MethodsThe database of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) was used during the study period (2009–2014).ResultsThe participation rate increased from 41.10% in 2009 to 51.52% in 2014 (annual percentage change, 4.126%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.253–6.034). During the study period, women ≥70 years of age had the lowest rate of participation (range, 21.7%–31.9%) and those 30–39 years of age the second-lowest (27.7%–44.9%). The participation rates of National Health Insurance beneficiaries (range, 48.6%–52.5%) were higher than those of Medical Aid Program (MAP) recipients (29.6%–33.2%). The rates of abnormal results were 0.65% in 2009 and 0.52% in 2014, with a decreasing tendency in all age groups except the youngest (30–39 years). Every year the abnormal result rates tended to decrease with age, from the age groups of 30–39 years to 60–69 years but increased in women ≥70 years of age. The ratio of patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance compared with those with squamous intraepithelial lesions increased from 2.71 in 2009 to 4.91 in 2014.ConclusionDifferences related to age and occurring over time were found in the rates of participation and abnormal results. Further efforts are needed to encourage participation in cervical cancer screening, especially for MAP recipients, elderly women and women 30–39 years of age. Quality control measures for cervical cancer screening programs should be enforced consistently.
“…Because HR-HPV infection is a necessary cause of cervical cancer, tests for HR-HPV have been proposed as an adjunctive tool to cervical cytology [16]. In our study, we evaluated whether there are differences in risk among 12 non-16/18 HR-HPV genotypes.…”
ObjectiveInfection with high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is the major cause of invasive cervical cancers. HPV-16 and HPV-18 are known to be responsible for two-thirds of all invasive cervical carcinomas, followed by HPV-45, -31, and -33. Current guidelines only differentiate HPV-16/18 (+) by recommending direct colposcopy for treatment. We tried to evaluate whether there are differences in risk among 12 non-16/18 HR-HPV genotypes in this study.MethodsThe pathology archive database records of 1,102 consecutive gynecologic patients, who had results for cervical cytology and histology and for HPV testing, as determined by HPV 9G DNA chip, were reviewed.ResultsAmong the 1,102 patients, 346 were non-16/18 HR-HPV (+) and 231 were HPV-16/18 (+). We calculated the odds ratios for ≥cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN 2) of 14 groups of each HR-HPV genotype compared with a group of HR-HPV (–) patients. Based on the odds ratio of each genotype, we divided patients with non-16/18 HR-HPV genotypes (+) into two groups: HPV-31/33/35/45/52/58 (+) and HPV-39/51/56/59/66/68 (+). The age-adjusted odds ratios for ≥CIN 2 of the HPV-31/33/35/45/52/58 (+) and HPV-39/51/56/59/66/68 (+) groups compared with a HR-HPV (–) group were 11.9 (95% CI, 7.6 to 18.8; p<0.001) and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.3; p<0.001), respectively, while that of the HPV-16/18 (+) group was 18.1 (95% CI, 11.6 to 28.3; p=0.003).ConclusionThe 12 non-16/18 HR-HPV genotypes can be further categorized (HPV-31/33/35/45/52/58 vs. HPV-39/51/56/59/66/68) by risk stratification. The HPV-31/33/35/45/52/58 genotypes might need more aggressive action. Large scale clinical trials or cohort studies are necessary to confirm our suggestion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.