2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The knowledge spillover effects of FDI on the productivity and efficiency of research activities in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…en, infrastructure level, industrial structure, marketization level, and opening degree are chosen to construct comprehensive index to measure the regulation foundation. Moreover, studies have shown that technology research and development strength, domestic capital stock of R&D, and foreign direct investment have significantly influence on productivity [24][25][26]. Considering that the green total factor productivity may have the certain continuity, a dynamic econometric model would be adopted.…”
Section: Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…en, infrastructure level, industrial structure, marketization level, and opening degree are chosen to construct comprehensive index to measure the regulation foundation. Moreover, studies have shown that technology research and development strength, domestic capital stock of R&D, and foreign direct investment have significantly influence on productivity [24][25][26]. Considering that the green total factor productivity may have the certain continuity, a dynamic econometric model would be adopted.…”
Section: Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branstetter (2000) examines the role that FDI played in facilitating knowledge spillovers to and from Japanese firms investing in the US. Cheung and Lin (2004) show that FDI is associated with increased patenting in China at the provincial level as does Zhang (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With this backdrop, considerable efforts have been devoted to understanding the effects of FDI on various dimensions of the Chinese economy. This string of literature has centered on the growth effect of hosting FDI (Berthélemy and Démurger 2000;Su and Liu 2016;Yalta 2013; Zhao 2012) alongside a subset focus on potential pertinent channels (Fu 2004;2008;Liu et al 2009;Zhang 2017). Recently, attention has been directed to its potential effects on institutional and environmental aspects (Chen 2017;Elliot et al 2013;Long et al 2015;Salim et al 2017a;Yang et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologica lly, these characteristics minimize unobserved fixed effects that often plague cross-country studies on this topical issue (Salim et al 2017b). Further, the short but vibrant history of hosting FDI and its uneven regional distribution has been substantially enriched within and between variations across Chinese regions (Su and Liu 2016;Zhang 2017). It is possible to take advantage of this opening up "policy experiment" to identify the empirical relationship between FDI and DI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%