2004
DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140430905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
110
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
110
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, based on the Knowledge‐Attitude‐Behavior model (KAB; see review by Schrader & Lawless, ), we aim to examine factors that affect EU consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) more for environmentally‐friendly products, such as (a) consumer's environmental product attitudes , (b) subjective knowledge about the environmental impact of products , and (c) the perceived importance of products’ environmental impact . The KAB model assumes that the buildup of knowledge (i.e., subjective knowledge about the environmental impact of products ) will lead to changes in attitudes (i.e., consumer's environmental product attitudes , and in the perceived importance of products’ environmental impact) and/or behaviors (i.e., WTP more for environmentally‐friendly products) , as per Baranowski, Cullen, Nicklas, Thompson, and Baranowski ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, based on the Knowledge‐Attitude‐Behavior model (KAB; see review by Schrader & Lawless, ), we aim to examine factors that affect EU consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) more for environmentally‐friendly products, such as (a) consumer's environmental product attitudes , (b) subjective knowledge about the environmental impact of products , and (c) the perceived importance of products’ environmental impact . The KAB model assumes that the buildup of knowledge (i.e., subjective knowledge about the environmental impact of products ) will lead to changes in attitudes (i.e., consumer's environmental product attitudes , and in the perceived importance of products’ environmental impact) and/or behaviors (i.e., WTP more for environmentally‐friendly products) , as per Baranowski, Cullen, Nicklas, Thompson, and Baranowski ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this gap, the Biobanking Attitudes and Knowledge Survey (BANKS) (Wells et al 2014) was developed in English based on the knowledgeattitudes-behavior (KAB) approach (Schrader and Lawless 2004). The BANKS development used an iterative and community-engaged process including a review of existing related measures; a review of focus group data conducted with English and Spanish-speaking participants (Luque et al 2012) and the development and revision of an item pool using cognitive interviews, content validity assessment by an expert panel, and pilot testing (Wells et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in improvement between groups is greater for the knowledge-related items than for attitude, consistent with the belief that knowledge affects attitude, which in turn affects behavior. 19,20 The genotyped group had tighter confidence intervals and more robust data as we would have expected based on sample size. However, that both groups improved in knowledge and attitude is encouraging, suggesting that once participation in genetic testing surpasses some threshold, non-genotyped students may learn vicariously through experiences and learning environment created by genotyped students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%