2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1867-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The KneeKG system: a review of the literature

Abstract: The KneeKG™ system provides reliable movement analysis. This system has the potential to improve understanding the biomechanical consequences of trauma or degenerative changes of the knee as well as more accurately quantify rotational laxity as detected by a positive pivot-shift test.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients' knee motions were recorded using KneeKG TM system [14,16], a noninvasive system for 3D analysis of the knee, in a weight-bearing and dynamic condition. It consists of an exoskeleton ( Fig.…”
Section: In Vivo Kinematic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients' knee motions were recorded using KneeKG TM system [14,16], a noninvasive system for 3D analysis of the knee, in a weight-bearing and dynamic condition. It consists of an exoskeleton ( Fig.…”
Section: In Vivo Kinematic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because AP translation is small and can be affected by the choice of assessment system, few studies have analysed movments in this plane [2,12]. The quasistatistcal fixation of our assessment system is the first to examine anterior-posterior translation during walking [13,14]. The objective of this study was to use 3D motion analyses (KneeKG TM ) to identify changes in kinematic variables of patients with OA of the knee during a complete gait cycle and to correlate them with clinical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the knee, the KneeKG was used since it was designed to significantly reduce relative movement between skin and bone and it has been extensively validated in previous studies. [15,16] It provides repeatable (0.4…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] In order to measure ankle kinematics, additional reflective markers were fixed onto the lateral and medial malleoli, onto the calcaneus, and onto the distal phalanx of the second metatarsal.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic squats were standardized with a proprioceptive jig . The KneeKG™ provides repeatable and reliable measurements (Lustig et al 2012), but they are still influenced by soft tissue artefacts (STA) with kinematics errors up to 7° and 11 mm (Südhoff et al 2007). These STA errors were therefore corrected with a multi-body optimization method (MBO) (Gasparutto et al 2015) The lower limb model used in MBO consisted of 4 segments (pelvis, femur, tibia, foot) imposing spherical joint constraints at the hip and ankle, and parallel mechanism constraints at the knee.…”
Section: Kinematic Acquisition and Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%