2011
DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2011.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kinship or k-Index as an Antidote Against the Toxic Effects of h-Indices

Abstract: In a bilingual paper entitled 'Bibliometrics as weapons of mass citation – La bibliométrie comme arme de citation massive', recently translated into English, we have argued that the current fashion of ranking people, papers and journals is anything but harmless. The point was forcefully supported by Richard Ernst in a post-face entitled 'The Follies of Citation Indices and Academic Ranking Lists.' We received a surprising number of passionate responses, such as 'It's written out of my heart' (TH); 'Je soutien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). These attributions are further supported by the fact that the pK a of a silanol at the surface of silica is around 8.5, 25 whereas that of trialkylsilanols (expected to be close to the pK a of a silanol at a silicon surface) is in the range 12-14; [26][27][28] hence, the softening of the water-OH frequency in a ≡Si-O − • • •H-O-H complex in concentrated KOH solution is expected to be more pronounced for a silanolate at the surface of silicon than for one at the surface of silica. Also, the broad low-energy contribution may result from the presence of NBO sites at the silicon surface through another (non exclusive) mechanism: since the pK a value of a silanol at the silicon surface may approach 14 and titration curves are known to be significantly broadened at surfaces, 29 it is likely that a nonnegligible number of silanol groups (i.e., in the protonated form) will survive at the silicon surface even in our experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…5). These attributions are further supported by the fact that the pK a of a silanol at the surface of silica is around 8.5, 25 whereas that of trialkylsilanols (expected to be close to the pK a of a silanol at a silicon surface) is in the range 12-14; [26][27][28] hence, the softening of the water-OH frequency in a ≡Si-O − • • •H-O-H complex in concentrated KOH solution is expected to be more pronounced for a silanolate at the surface of silicon than for one at the surface of silica. Also, the broad low-energy contribution may result from the presence of NBO sites at the silicon surface through another (non exclusive) mechanism: since the pK a value of a silanol at the silicon surface may approach 14 and titration curves are known to be significantly broadened at surfaces, 29 it is likely that a nonnegligible number of silanol groups (i.e., in the protonated form) will survive at the silicon surface even in our experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A more recent driver of editorial policy among professional research journals, such as Emu has become, is the increasingly pervasive practice of measuring the status of both authors and journals via citation indices (e.g. Hirsch 2005), despite the many shortcomings of such an approach (see Molinie and Bodenhausen 2011). Journals that are cited more attract papers by authors for whom this metric is important.…”
Section: Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation has been eloquently criticized by Molinie and Bodenhausen (Molinie & Bodenhausen, 2010) and wholeheartedly endorsed in an essay by Ernst (2010). The former authors then proposed a different index, named tongue‐in‐cheek the k ‐factor, where k stood for kinship (Molinie & Bodenhausen, 2011). It is illustrative that according to SciFinder, the Molinie–Bodenhausen papers have collectively been cited four times since publication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%