1978
DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19780610620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinetics of the bimolecular sel‐reaction of t‐butyl radicals in solution. I. Termination rates

Abstract: SummaryTermination rate constants 2Kt for the self-reaction of t-butyl radicals in twelve different solvents are determined as a function of temperature by kinetic electron spin resonance. In the entire range measured, 7 . 107<2k,<2 . 10'O dm3 mol-' s-I, they are well described by the von Smoluchowski equation for diffusion controlled reactions, using a spin statistical factor, a temperature and solvent independent, isotropic reaction diameter, and diffusion coefficients for t-butyl estimated following empiric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
2
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
66
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured rate constant for decay, 2k,4 = 5.9 x lo9 M -I s-l, indicates that this reaction is diffusion controlled, just as we would expect for this sterically unhindered ketiminyl (12). The variation of 2k,4 with temperature was computed from the temperature coefficient of viscosity of the solvent (21). Table 1.…”
Section: Measurement Of 2k"mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The measured rate constant for decay, 2k,4 = 5.9 x lo9 M -I s-l, indicates that this reaction is diffusion controlled, just as we would expect for this sterically unhindered ketiminyl (12). The variation of 2k,4 with temperature was computed from the temperature coefficient of viscosity of the solvent (21). Table 1.…”
Section: Measurement Of 2k"mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…gave 2k,(t-Bu') = 3.0 x loy M-' s-I, (lit. (17), 2k,(t-Bu') = 2.9 x loy M-I s-I), for the same conditions. This excellent agreement serves to confirm that the light was uniformly distributed across the sample in our epr cavity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…12 In both solvents the size of the polarization is that expected from the geminate polarization and the product distribution, with some losses from pure nuclear relaxation. The kinetics could also be simulated with rate constants that agreed with those measured by kinetic EPR experiments 42 and without the inclusion of cross-relaxation. A similar value of T 1 N ∼ 100 µs was required for both solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%