1981
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(81)85095-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinetics of non-isothermal decomposition of metal complexes of hippuric acid with Cu(II), Cd(II), Pb(II), Fe(III) and Pr(III)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of them are (a) ingestion–elimination of a potential nucleation site by the growth of an existing nucleus, and (b) coalescence–loss of reactant/product interface when reaction zones of two or more growing nuclei merge. According to literature, n values of Avrami-Erofeev equation depends on the mechanism of the reaction based on the constant nucleation rate or growth of a constant number of nucleation mechanism (zero nucleation rate): for the former, n = 2 is referred to one-dimensional growth, n = 3 to two-dimensional growth, and n = 4 to three-dimensional growth; for the latter n = 1 is referred to one-dimensional growth, n = 2 two-dimensional growth, and n = 3 for three-dimensional growth. So, in considering literature and the most common n values found in the present simulation, the A -type degradation mechanism was discarded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of them are (a) ingestion–elimination of a potential nucleation site by the growth of an existing nucleus, and (b) coalescence–loss of reactant/product interface when reaction zones of two or more growing nuclei merge. According to literature, n values of Avrami-Erofeev equation depends on the mechanism of the reaction based on the constant nucleation rate or growth of a constant number of nucleation mechanism (zero nucleation rate): for the former, n = 2 is referred to one-dimensional growth, n = 3 to two-dimensional growth, and n = 4 to three-dimensional growth; for the latter n = 1 is referred to one-dimensional growth, n = 2 two-dimensional growth, and n = 3 for three-dimensional growth. So, in considering literature and the most common n values found in the present simulation, the A -type degradation mechanism was discarded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%