1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-2180(72)80139-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinetics of combustion of gaseous sulphur compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
110
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
5
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulfur trioxide is known to absorb on glass surfaces where it may act to promote the recombination of atomic oxygen. 27,28 However, an experiment conducted in a flow reactor with half the diameter (i.e., twice the surface-to-volume ratio) of the standard reactor yielded a value of k 1b , which within the scatter was in agreement with the data from the larger reactor. From an assessment of each contribution, we estimate the overall uncertainty in k 1b to be a factor of 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Sulfur trioxide is known to absorb on glass surfaces where it may act to promote the recombination of atomic oxygen. 27,28 However, an experiment conducted in a flow reactor with half the diameter (i.e., twice the surface-to-volume ratio) of the standard reactor yielded a value of k 1b , which within the scatter was in agreement with the data from the larger reactor. From an assessment of each contribution, we estimate the overall uncertainty in k 1b to be a factor of 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…12 In this work, a sink for atomic oxygen was required to explain the experimental results, and the loss of O was attributed partly to reaction with SO 3 (2). This interpretation is in conflict with the present value of k 2 .…”
Section: Modeling Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…7,23,43 The flame results have consistently been interpreted in terms of a fast rate constant for the SO 3 + O reaction (2). On the basis of a more accurate value of k 4 , the authors 12 recently reanalyzed the results of Smith and co-workers 21,22 and Merryman and Levy 20 to obtain a value of k′ 2 ) 7.8 × 10 11 exp(-3065/T) cm 3 /(mol s), in support of the earlier estimates.…”
Section: Modeling Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations