1972
DOI: 10.3367/ufnr.0106.197202a.0193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinetic nature of the strength of solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
36
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength of a solid obtained like this is called the theoretical strength of a solid. The actual strength of solids is much less (by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude) than that theoretical one predicted by crystal lattice theory [5,6]. The physics of strength approach is justified in this paper because the mechanical failure energy U 0 is found to coincide with the sublimation energy Q, i. e., the interatomic binding energy [5,6], (see Table).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The strength of a solid obtained like this is called the theoretical strength of a solid. The actual strength of solids is much less (by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude) than that theoretical one predicted by crystal lattice theory [5,6]. The physics of strength approach is justified in this paper because the mechanical failure energy U 0 is found to coincide with the sublimation energy Q, i. e., the interatomic binding energy [5,6], (see Table).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been proven in the works of S.N. Zhurkov and his workers [5][6][7][8] and references therein.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diffraction techniques (Regel', Slutsker & Tomashevskii, 1974, Kraus at al., 1993, Schors at al., 2006 give precious few information on the nucleation and development of the microcrack ensemble with the exception of the fact that these ensembles are formed quite rapidly (say, in creep mode), and then their further evolution becomes, really, exhausted. As a rule, it is postulated that even the cracks of such a scale can be regarded a priori as conventional stress concentrators (Arias et al, 2003, Bouchbinder at al., 2004, Nasseri at al., 2006; to our best knowledge, the latter postulate was not confirmed experimentally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%