Abstract:The overhead throwing motion is a complex activity that is achieved through activation of the kinetic chain. The kinetic chain refers to the linkage of multiple segments of the body that allows for transfer of forces and motion. The lower extremities and core provide a base of support, generating energy that is transferred eventually through the throwing arm and hand, resulting in release of the ball. The kinetic chain requires optimal anatomy, physiology, and mechanics and is involved in all 6 phases of overh… Show more
“…Overhead athletic performance is not isolated to a single event or joint. Maximising force development in the large muscles of the core and legs produces more than 51%–55% of the kinetic energy that is transferred to the hand 63. Overhead throwing motion is a complex activity, involving the shoulder, trunk, spine and lumbo-pelvic-hip complex, that is achieved through the activation of the kinetic chain,63 to allow the sequential transfer of forces and motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximising force development in the large muscles of the core and legs produces more than 51%–55% of the kinetic energy that is transferred to the hand 63. Overhead throwing motion is a complex activity, involving the shoulder, trunk, spine and lumbo-pelvic-hip complex, that is achieved through the activation of the kinetic chain,63 to allow the sequential transfer of forces and motion. The throwing motion is a fluid, continuous movement that begins with the feet, which provide contact with the ground, maximising the ground reaction force, and creating a stable base for distal arm mobility 63…”
Objective To produce a best evidence synthesis of exercise prescription used when treating shoulder pathology in the overhead athlete. Design A systematic review of exercises used in overhead athletes including case studies and clinical commentaries. Data sources MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL from database inception through July 8, 2016. Methods We examined data from randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort (level I-IV evidence) studies that addressed exercise intervention in the rehabilitation of the overhead athlete with shoulder pathology. Case studies and clinical commentaries (level V evidence) were examined to account for expert opinion-based research. Data were combined using best evidence synthesis and graded (A-F) recommendations (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). Results There were 33 unique exercises in six level I-IV studies that met our inclusion criteria. Most exercises were single-plane, upper extremity exercises performed below 90 o of elevation. There were 102 unique exercises in 33 level V studies that met our inclusion criteria. These exercises emphasised plyometrics, kinetic chain and sport-specific training. Conclusions and relevance Overall, evidence for exercise interventions in overhead athletes with shoulder pathology is dominated by expert opinion (grade D). There is great variability between exercise approaches suggested by experts and those investigated in research studies and the overall level of evidence is low. The strongest available evidence (level B) supports the use of single-plane, open chain upper extremity exercises performed below 90° of elevation and closed chain upper extremity exercises. Clinical expert pieces support a more advanced, global treatment approach consistent with the complex, multidimensional nature of sport.
“…Overhead athletic performance is not isolated to a single event or joint. Maximising force development in the large muscles of the core and legs produces more than 51%–55% of the kinetic energy that is transferred to the hand 63. Overhead throwing motion is a complex activity, involving the shoulder, trunk, spine and lumbo-pelvic-hip complex, that is achieved through the activation of the kinetic chain,63 to allow the sequential transfer of forces and motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximising force development in the large muscles of the core and legs produces more than 51%–55% of the kinetic energy that is transferred to the hand 63. Overhead throwing motion is a complex activity, involving the shoulder, trunk, spine and lumbo-pelvic-hip complex, that is achieved through the activation of the kinetic chain,63 to allow the sequential transfer of forces and motion. The throwing motion is a fluid, continuous movement that begins with the feet, which provide contact with the ground, maximising the ground reaction force, and creating a stable base for distal arm mobility 63…”
Objective To produce a best evidence synthesis of exercise prescription used when treating shoulder pathology in the overhead athlete. Design A systematic review of exercises used in overhead athletes including case studies and clinical commentaries. Data sources MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL from database inception through July 8, 2016. Methods We examined data from randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort (level I-IV evidence) studies that addressed exercise intervention in the rehabilitation of the overhead athlete with shoulder pathology. Case studies and clinical commentaries (level V evidence) were examined to account for expert opinion-based research. Data were combined using best evidence synthesis and graded (A-F) recommendations (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). Results There were 33 unique exercises in six level I-IV studies that met our inclusion criteria. Most exercises were single-plane, upper extremity exercises performed below 90 o of elevation. There were 102 unique exercises in 33 level V studies that met our inclusion criteria. These exercises emphasised plyometrics, kinetic chain and sport-specific training. Conclusions and relevance Overall, evidence for exercise interventions in overhead athletes with shoulder pathology is dominated by expert opinion (grade D). There is great variability between exercise approaches suggested by experts and those investigated in research studies and the overall level of evidence is low. The strongest available evidence (level B) supports the use of single-plane, open chain upper extremity exercises performed below 90° of elevation and closed chain upper extremity exercises. Clinical expert pieces support a more advanced, global treatment approach consistent with the complex, multidimensional nature of sport.
“…Such high repetition of a singular movement pattern may lead to overuse injury. Throwing is a complex dynamic movement that requires efficient use of the kinetic chain [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, force is generated in the proximal lower extremity and then transferred thorough the lumbopelvic-hip complex (LPHC), to the distal upper extremity, and on to the ball at release. Trunk musculature contributes to LPHC stability during the overhead throwing motion is important not only for postural control but to also generate and transfer force from the lower extremity to the upper extremity [8]. Due to the unilateral nature of the overhead throw, structural and mechanical asymmetries develop in overhead throwing athletes; meanwhile, such asymmetries may place athletes at a greater risk of injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the overhead throwing motion as a total body dynamic activity, awareness of segmental asymmetries that could result in kinetic chain alterations is needed. As any alteration in the kinetic chain could result in compensations and ultimately injury to the more distal segments in the chain [8].…”
The purpose of this study was to assess single-leg squat (SLS) performance on reported pain. Forty-two youth softball athletes (13.0 ± 2.0 years; 162.19 ± 9.75 cm; 60.80 ± 14.28 kg) completed a bilateral SLS and a health history questionnaire in which they indicated if they were currently experiencing any pain/discomfort. Due to the clinical significance of the current study, p < 0.10 was classified as nearing significance. A point-biserial correlation was run between the groups (pain and no pain) and all kinematic variables (maximal knee flexion, knee valgus/varus, vertical sacrum displacement, anterior pelvic tilt, and pelvic lateral tilt) at each event (45 • descent, maximal knee flexion, and 45 • ascent), across each phase (descent, ascent), and between legs. Increased vertical sacrum displacement was correlated with pain at 45 • ascent and at maximal knee flexion in the right SLS. Knee valgus at maximal knee flexion, 45 • ascent, and in the decent phase of the left SLS was significant. Anterior pelvic tilt in the decent phase of the left SLS and knee valgus and pelvic lateral tilt in the decent phase of the right SLS were found to be significantly correlated with pain. Poor SLS performance was correlated with reported pain.
BackgroundInjuries in younger baseball athletes continue to increase despite work characterizing risk factors. Three‐dimensional (3D) motion capture may identify suboptimal pitching mechanics that predispose an athlete to injury, but 3D‐motion analysis is often inaccessible. Thus, there is a gap between the current biomechanics literature and its practical application in young athletes. The current study aims to assess the reliability of the pitch efficiency rating (PER) as a systematic tool to evaluate throwing mechanics in developing baseball pitchers.ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of application and reliability of a novel, scientifically informed tool (PER) for the assessment of pitching mechanics.DesignReliability study using Bland–Altman methods for assessing agreement between two raters.SettingAcademic medical center through community outreach.ParticipantsPitching mechanics were assessed and rated with the PER for 40 athletes (26 high school, 14 Division III), average age 19.0 years old (range 15.3–23.7 years old).InterventionsN/A.Main Outcome MeasuresInterrater and intrarater reliability as calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsFor initial readings comparing interrater reliability between Rater 1 and Rater 2, the ICC was calculated at 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.89) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60–0.86) for the second set of ratings. Regarding intrarater reliability across reads, ICC was found to be 0.63 (95% CI 0.43–0.79) for Rater 1, and 0.91 for Rater 2 (95% CI 0.85–0.95).ConclusionsThe present study introduces the PER as a potential tool for evaluating pitching mechanics. However, the intrarater reliability of the PER did not meet preestablished criteria in one of the two pilot raters. Further study is needed to continue to assess the reliability of the tool across diverse demographics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.