2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The kinematic signature of the Galactic warp inGaiaDR1

Abstract: Context. The mechanism responsible for the warp of our Galaxy, as well as its dynamical nature, continues to remain unknown. With the advent of high precision astrometry, new horizons have been opened for detecting the kinematics associated with the warp and for constraining possible warp formation scenarios for the Milky Way. Aims. The aim of this contribution is to establish whether the first Gaia data release (DR1) shows significant evidence of the kinematic signature expected from a long-lived Galactic war… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each star we use Gaia DR2 galactic coordinates l and b, the parallax , and the component of the proper motion perpendicular to the galactic plane µ b , derived from Gaia's astrometry (see Methods). We only consider µ b as the Galactic warp primarily manifests itself kinematically as systematic motions perpendicular to the Galactic plane 18 . We also construct the covariance matrix Σ ,µ b * , which includes the astrometric uncertainties on and µ b , together with their correlation ρ ,µ b , neglecting the uncertainties in the coordinates (l, b).…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each star we use Gaia DR2 galactic coordinates l and b, the parallax , and the component of the proper motion perpendicular to the galactic plane µ b , derived from Gaia's astrometry (see Methods). We only consider µ b as the Galactic warp primarily manifests itself kinematically as systematic motions perpendicular to the Galactic plane 18 . We also construct the covariance matrix Σ ,µ b * , which includes the astrometric uncertainties on and µ b , together with their correlation ρ ,µ b , neglecting the uncertainties in the coordinates (l, b).…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt a simple density model for the Galactic disc ρ(l, b, r), consisting of an exponential disc in Galactocentric radius R and vertical height z, with a radial scale length L R = 2.6 kpc (Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard 2016) and vertical scale height h z = 150 pc (larger than the known scale height for OB stars, Poggio et al 2017). We assume for the Sun R =8.34 kpc (Reid et al 2014) and z = 25 pc (Bland-Hawthorn & Gerhard 2016).…”
Section: Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have discussed the possibility that the Galactic warp may be generated by the interaction with the Magellanic Clouds (Burke 1957;Weinberg & Blitz 2006) or Sagittarius (Bailin 2003), while other scenarios suggest that a warped structure in a galaxy disc may be generated by a dark matter halo distribution that is off-centred or tilted with respect to the baryonic one (Bailin & Steinmetz 2003), by bending instabilities (Revaz & Pfenniger 2004) in the disc, or by misaligned infall of material (Ostriker & Binney 1989;Quinn & Binney 1992). These scenarios predict either long-lived, transient, or repeatedly excited structures, and it is clear that to understand the origin of the Galactic warp, we need to understand its dynamical nature, since, for example, a long-lived warp would leave a specific signature in the kinematics of stars in the outer disc (Abedi et al 2014;Poggio et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%