2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The key to group fitness: The presence of another synchronizes moral attitudes and neural responses during moral decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, this tDCS study used a within‐subject crossover design to control for inter‐individual differences to a certain degree. Second, while the rTPJ is also a significant neural marker for theory of mind (Krall et al, 2015 ), cognitive empathy (Decety & Jackson, 2004 ; Decety & Sommerville, 2003 ), and self‐referential processing (Qin et al, 2020 ), future studies incorporating relevant dispositional assessments (Chen et al, 2020 ) with a larger sample size are encouraged to corroborate the present findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Herein, this tDCS study used a within‐subject crossover design to control for inter‐individual differences to a certain degree. Second, while the rTPJ is also a significant neural marker for theory of mind (Krall et al, 2015 ), cognitive empathy (Decety & Jackson, 2004 ; Decety & Sommerville, 2003 ), and self‐referential processing (Qin et al, 2020 ), future studies incorporating relevant dispositional assessments (Chen et al, 2020 ) with a larger sample size are encouraged to corroborate the present findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To estimate the sample size needed for this placebo-controlled, crossover design study, we implemented G*power 3.1 ( Faul et al, 2009 ). Based on the effect size f (ranging from 0.2 to 0.22) for the primary fMRI outcomes found in previous fMRI literature using similar stimuli ( Chen et al, 2016 , 2020a ), and in order to have 95% power, 70–84 participants would be required with a two-sided type I error of 0.05. Accordingly, 80 participants were enrolled, with one participant being excluded due to loss of follow-up, and other two participants being equally excluded due to excessive head motion (no.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we designed a virtual obedience paradigm inspired by prior studies on obedience to authority ( Caspar et al, 2016 , 2018 , 2020a , 2020b ; Chen et al, 2020a ), in which an experimenter ordered a subject to inflict harm to a third party ( Figure 1A ). During fMRI scanning, participants watched the first image of a morally laden mini clip, then they were ordered (ordered via textual instructions) to press a handheld button in order to initiate the successive image sequence which show the actions taken to full completion and that carry different moral consequences, including harming, neutral, or helping actions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual stimuli 45 validated animations from previous fMRI studies were presented to participants in the coercivehelping and coercive-harming tasks (Chen et al, 2020a;Chen et al, 2020b). Each animation was comprised of three images, with no duration limit set for the 1st image, but a 200 milliseconds duration set for the 2nd image, and a 1000 milliseconds duration set for the 3rd image, and portraying the following scenarios: [1] a person who is alleviating physical pain from a suffering person (helping), [2] a person who is taking an action to physically harm another person (harming), and [3] a baseline stimuli depicting a person carrying out an action that is irrelevant to another person (neutral).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%