2015
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Key Regulator for Language and Speech Development, FOXP2, is a Novel Substrate for SUMOylation

Abstract: Transcription factor forkhead box protein P2 (FOXP2) plays an essential role in the development of language and speech. However, the transcriptional activity of FOXP2 regulated by the post-translational modifications remains unknown. Here we demonstrated that FOXP2 is clearly defined as a SUMO target protein at the cellular levels as FOXP2 is covalently modified by both SUMO1 and SUMO3. Furthermore, SUMOylation of FOXP2 was significantly decreased by SENP2 (a specific SUMOylation protease). We further showed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, loss of the lysine residue of FOXP2 at K647 could have additional detrimental effects in addition to loss of sumoylation, such as conformational changes of FOXP2 leading to altered protein-protein interaction or DNA binding, alterations of other post-transcriptional modifications like ubiquitination, or protein stability. We investigated a number of these possibilities, but there were no differences between FOXP2 WT and KR in our experiments (Figures S6 and S9 in Supplement 1, data not shown), consistent with a recent study showing that FOXP2 sumoylation does not affect protein stability (26). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, loss of the lysine residue of FOXP2 at K647 could have additional detrimental effects in addition to loss of sumoylation, such as conformational changes of FOXP2 leading to altered protein-protein interaction or DNA binding, alterations of other post-transcriptional modifications like ubiquitination, or protein stability. We investigated a number of these possibilities, but there were no differences between FOXP2 WT and KR in our experiments (Figures S6 and S9 in Supplement 1, data not shown), consistent with a recent study showing that FOXP2 sumoylation does not affect protein stability (26). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When we expressed wild type FOXP2 (FOXP2 WT) in 293T cells, we also observed a higher molecular weight band recognized by a FOXP2 antibody that is decreased by H 2 O 2 treatment, a mechanism for reversible inhibition of SUMO conjugating enzymes (31) (Figure 1C) and ginkgolic acid (26, 32), a sumoylation-specific inhibitor (Figure 1D). Furthermore, in both 293T cells and mouse cerebellum, this high molecular weight band is recognized by either FOXP2 or SUMO-1 antibody in lysates that have undergone immunoprecipitation with an antibody recognizing SUMO-1 or FLAG (to capture FLAG-tagged FOXP2) respectively (Figure 1B–D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations