2021
DOI: 10.1177/0725513620985651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kelsen-Bauer debate on Marxist state theory and the equilibrium of class forces

Abstract: This serves as an introduction to a debate between Hans Kelsen and Otto Bauer concerning the nature and relative autonomy of the state, and the theories that informed the political practices of the Austro-Marxists and of the SDAP (Austrian Social Democratic Workers’ Party) immediately after the fall of the monarchy and during the early years of the First Republic. Both pieces (translated below) were published in Der Kampf ( The Campaign), the SDAP’s theoretical journal, in which many key texts of Austro-Marxis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, precisely this argument was made at the time by the legal theorist Hans Kelsen in his critique of Otto Bauer's notion of a 'functional' -as opposed to merely 'formal' -democracy. Even when expressed in Marxist language, such political holism implies an 'organic view of society' that assesses social groups according to 'their function for the whole social body' (Kelsen, 1924(Kelsen, /2021. Like Rosenblum, Kelsen notes that such a functionalist and organicist view of society and of the state is anti-majoritarian, and he thus doubts whether it 'really is "democratic"' (Kelsen, 1924(Kelsen, /2021).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: the Politics Of Social Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, precisely this argument was made at the time by the legal theorist Hans Kelsen in his critique of Otto Bauer's notion of a 'functional' -as opposed to merely 'formal' -democracy. Even when expressed in Marxist language, such political holism implies an 'organic view of society' that assesses social groups according to 'their function for the whole social body' (Kelsen, 1924(Kelsen, /2021. Like Rosenblum, Kelsen notes that such a functionalist and organicist view of society and of the state is anti-majoritarian, and he thus doubts whether it 'really is "democratic"' (Kelsen, 1924(Kelsen, /2021).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: the Politics Of Social Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 See e.g. Blum andSmaldone (2016, 2017), Scott (2021), Uebel (2004), as well as the not so recent Bottomore and Goode (1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%