2006
DOI: 10.1112/s0024610706022873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kato Square Root Problem for Mixed Boundary Value Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the upper half-space, this estimate was already available from [Axelsson et al 2006b] as a consequence of the strategy to prove the Kato conjecture on ‫ޒ‬ n . We shall need to prove it on the sphere, essentially by localization and reduction to [Axelsson et al 2006a], where such estimates were proved for first-order operators with boundary conditions. An implication of independent interest is the solution to the Kato square root on Lipschitz manifolds.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the upper half-space, this estimate was already available from [Axelsson et al 2006b] as a consequence of the strategy to prove the Kato conjecture on ‫ޒ‬ n . We shall need to prove it on the sphere, essentially by localization and reduction to [Axelsson et al 2006a], where such estimates were proved for first-order operators with boundary conditions. An implication of independent interest is the solution to the Kato square root on Lipschitz manifolds.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later mathematicians tried to find new classes of operators satisfying the Kato conjecture. For strongly elliptic differential operators with measurable bounded coefficients, corresponding results were obtained in . The main difficulties in this case were related to an absence of smoothness for generalized solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…122;17,Sec. 11]; c can be assumed to be sufficiently large), then Condition 1 holds by virtue of the results in [18].…”
Section: Theorem 2 Let Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%