A question has been raised (Blake, Lawson, & Nordland, 1976) as to the appropriateness of using the Karplus Islands Puzzle as an instrument to assess formal-operational thought. Such questions need to be asked about many of the socalled "tasks" currently found in the literature.The Karplus Islands Puzzle Clue 3 is then presented and Question 2 is asked (i.e., "Is it possible to travel between Fish and Bird?").Given both p and 4 as true, the subject must now determine the value of s in addition to recognizing that the value of s is independent of the value of r (i.e., s[r]). In effect, the operation of implication is employed again in the form ( p 4) 3 s.Finally, Question 3 is asked (i.e., "Is it possible to travel between Fish and Snail?"), and the subject must determine the value of t based on p . 4, and i, or (p ' 4 + 7) 3 t, F, or neither. This implication is a beginning, but the correct solution is most often derived from the reciprocal operation (i.e., converse implication) by employing the following sequence: if t were true than p , 4, and r must be true, or t 3 (pa 4. r). But r is given as not-r @); therefore, t cannot be true, or (p . 4. P) 3 7.Additional operations may be employed. For example, some individuals recognize a form of equivalence (i.e., r and t must share the same value, either F and T, or r and t). The 361 3).