2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kardashian Index of Cardiologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As teachers, our participants reflected upon how they seek to produce high-quality content and to educate others to appraise content in the social media space. Finally, as either interactive investigators or translational teachers, they remarked on their sense of responsibility around the need to be accurate and not fall into the trap of becoming a ‘celebrity’ or ‘science Kardashian’ [ 16 18 ]. Due to their professional identity, our participants found it imperative to consider content accuracy and saw themselves as accountable for ensuring the validity and veracity of their content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As teachers, our participants reflected upon how they seek to produce high-quality content and to educate others to appraise content in the social media space. Finally, as either interactive investigators or translational teachers, they remarked on their sense of responsibility around the need to be accurate and not fall into the trap of becoming a ‘celebrity’ or ‘science Kardashian’ [ 16 18 ]. Due to their professional identity, our participants found it imperative to consider content accuracy and saw themselves as accountable for ensuring the validity and veracity of their content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kardiashian-Index; [15]). Bei Twitter-aktiven Kardiologen korreliert interessanterweise im Allgemeinen die Anzahl der Publikationen relativ gut mit der Anzahl der Twitter-Follower und "Kardiologen-Kardashians" gibt es nur selten [16].…”
Section: Limitationen Von Twitterunclassified
“…Earlier studies have alluded to a lower proportion of women physicians/scientists on Twitter. 7 , 13 More recently, in the study by Khan et al., three out of 17 female cardiologists (total of 238 studied) had inflated Twitter influence represented by the k-index. 13 Whether female INRs are less likely than men to self-promote 13 or whether it is merely a factor of decreased representation of women in interventional neuroradiology, 14 or a combination of both, is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%