2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The KAMET II methodology: Knowledge acquisition, knowledge modeling and knowledge generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output leading to efficiency considers the assisting factors that enhance knowledge transfer, the impeding factors that hinder knowledge transfer, and the success of knowledge transfer process [13]. The outcome leading to effectiveness considers the ability of knowledge receivers to solve problem, the reduction of mistakes, the increase of work performance in term of speed, and the success of knowledge transfer [14] as shown on the ride side of Figure 1.…”
Section: Towards a Conceptual Knowledge Transfer Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The output leading to efficiency considers the assisting factors that enhance knowledge transfer, the impeding factors that hinder knowledge transfer, and the success of knowledge transfer process [13]. The outcome leading to effectiveness considers the ability of knowledge receivers to solve problem, the reduction of mistakes, the increase of work performance in term of speed, and the success of knowledge transfer [14] as shown on the ride side of Figure 1.…”
Section: Towards a Conceptual Knowledge Transfer Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pioneering projects include the business engineering navigator (Winter, 2010), the semantic object model (Bork & Sinz, 2010;Ferstl, Sinz, & Bork, 2016), and the exemplary business process modeler (Breitling & Hofer, 2012). As at 2019, the OMiLAB community has successfully conceptualized almost 50 different modeling methods that originate from heterogeneous domains, such as multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO) (Bock & Frank, 2016), design thinking (Hawryszkiewycz & Prackwieser, 2016;Bork, Karagiannis, & Hawryszkiewycz, 2017;Miron, Muck, Karagiannis, & Götzinger, 2018), and knowledge management (Cairó & Guardati, 2012;Battistutti & Bork, 2017). Recent conceptualizations target bridging design thinking and conceptual modeling (Miron et al, 2018;Miron, Muck, & Karagiannis, 2019) and industrial business process management (Utz & Falcioni, 2018).…”
Section: The Omilab Open Innovation Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge acquisition has been applied to a diverse set of problems. A knowledge acquisition approach was used to develop diagnosis-specialized knowledge models [6]. A knowledge base, encoded with the NKRL (Narrative Knowledge Representation Language) formalism, was used in the management of gas/oil facilities to support tasks such as noticing gas leakage and taking steps to activate systems [39].…”
Section: Knowledge Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6: Interpretation of min and max value for seventeen quality measures.Our research is related to retail motor fuel prices. This section discusses previous research related to this topic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation