2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The K20 survey. V. The evolution of the near-IR Luminosity Function

Abstract: Abstract. We present the galaxy rest-frame near-IR Luminosity Function (LF) and its cosmic evolution to z ∼ 1.5 based on a spectroscopic survey of a magnitude limited sample of galaxies with K s < 20 (the K20 survey, Cimatti et al. 2002b). The LFs have been derived in the rest-frame J and K s bands. Their evolution is traced using three different redshift bins (z mean 0.5, 1, 1.5) and comparing them to the Local near-IR Luminosity Function. The luminosity functions at different redshifts are fairly well fitted… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

55
241
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
55
241
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results had previously been inferred from the evolution of the NIR luminosity function and density (e.g., Pozzetti et al 2003;Feulner et al 2003), and are in broad agreement with the downsizing scenario proposed more than ten years ago by Cowie et al (1996), where star formation activity was stronger, earlier, and faster for massive galaxies while low mass systems continued their activity to later cosmic times. The downsizing is consistent with several results obtained at low and high redshifts, such as the mass-dependent star formation histories of early-type galaxies (Thomas et al 2005), the evolution of the fundamental plane (e.g., Treu et al 2005;van der Wel et al 2005;di Serego Alighieri et al 2005), the evolution of the optical luminosity function of early-type galaxies to z ∼ 1 (Cimatti et al 2006;Scarlata et al 2007), the evolution of the cosmic star formation density and specific star formation (Gabasch et al 2006;Feulner et al 2005;Juneau et al 2005), and the evolution of the colour-magnitude relation (Tanaka et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results had previously been inferred from the evolution of the NIR luminosity function and density (e.g., Pozzetti et al 2003;Feulner et al 2003), and are in broad agreement with the downsizing scenario proposed more than ten years ago by Cowie et al (1996), where star formation activity was stronger, earlier, and faster for massive galaxies while low mass systems continued their activity to later cosmic times. The downsizing is consistent with several results obtained at low and high redshifts, such as the mass-dependent star formation histories of early-type galaxies (Thomas et al 2005), the evolution of the fundamental plane (e.g., Treu et al 2005;van der Wel et al 2005;di Serego Alighieri et al 2005), the evolution of the optical luminosity function of early-type galaxies to z ∼ 1 (Cimatti et al 2006;Scarlata et al 2007), the evolution of the cosmic star formation density and specific star formation (Gabasch et al 2006;Feulner et al 2005;Juneau et al 2005), and the evolution of the colour-magnitude relation (Tanaka et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Taking into account the redshift of the source (z = 1.985) and given its apparent magnitude (K ∼ 19.5 mag), the resulting rest-frame (k-corrected) K-band absolute magnitude is M K ∼ −25.5 mag, i.e. ∼1.6 times brighter than L * K galaxies at the same z (see Pozzetti et al 2003;Saracco et al 2006). Considering L * ∼ 2 × 10 11 L for galaxies at z ∼ 2 and assuming a stellar mass-to-light ratio of 0.5 (M/L) , we estimated a stellar mass of the order of 10 11 M for the host galaxy.…”
Section: Qso Activity and Massive Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age downsizing occurs separately for each of the two populations causing galaxy bimodality, i.e., a red peak (Thomas et al 2005;Fontana et al 2004; Thomas et al 2009) and a blue one (Noeske et al 2007a,b). However, it remains unclear whether the age downsizing is coupled with a mass-assembly downsizing scenario for galaxy evolution and formation (Fontana et al 2004Pozzetti et al 2003Pozzetti et al , 2007Cimatti et al 2006;Bundy et al 2006), i.e., if the more massive galaxies assembled their mass earlier than lower mass ones. Furthermore, do low-mass galaxies contain younger stars and assemble later even within the same spectral type?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very deep surveys have been exploited to describe the shape of the stellar mass function at high redshift Drory et al 2005;Gwyn & Hartwick 2005;Bundy et al 2006;Pozzetti et al 2007), but a clear picture about stellar mass assembly and how it depends on mass (mass-assembly downsizing) and galaxy type has not yet emerged. Previous studies have explored the evolution of different galaxy types in deep near-IR surveys, such as K20, by means of the K-band luminosity function (Pozzetti et al 2003) and the galaxy stellar mass function (Fontana et al 2004), using spectral classification (i.e., absorption-line galaxies versus emissionline galaxies), and in larger optical and near-IR surveys such as VVDS, COMBO17, and DEEP2, using colours or spectra to define galaxy types (Bell et al 2004;Cimatti et al 2006;Faber et al 2007;Zucca et al 2006;Arnouts et al 2007;Vergani et al 2008). Even if the results of these surveys remain disputed (compare for example Bell et al 2004;, for the same dataset), most of these studies agree that luminous and rather massive old galaxies were already quite common at z ∼ 1 and that their number density declines rapidly at yet higher redshift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%