2002
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/1.1.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The jury is out on 'guilt by association' trials

Abstract: The availability of comprehensive protein-protein interaction maps will significantly enhance medical research and aid the functional characterisation of novel genes. To date, the largest scale studies of protein-protein interactions have used the yeast two hybrid method. In this review we take a closer look at the different approaches used in these studies and discuss some key considerations that should be taken into account when designing high throughput interaction mapping projects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is equivalent to an average of 4.5 interactions per bait, which compares favorably to the number of interactions per bait in genome-wide Y2H studies (∼1 interaction per bait; see Semple et al 2002), and thus demonstrates the additional information that can result from performing comprehensive pathway-focused interaction mapping studies in addition to genome-wide projects (Walhout et al 2000). As with the results of any high-throughput interaction assay, the interactions listed here should be considered as putative or predicted interactions.…”
Section: Interactions With Other Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is equivalent to an average of 4.5 interactions per bait, which compares favorably to the number of interactions per bait in genome-wide Y2H studies (∼1 interaction per bait; see Semple et al 2002), and thus demonstrates the additional information that can result from performing comprehensive pathway-focused interaction mapping studies in addition to genome-wide projects (Walhout et al 2000). As with the results of any high-throughput interaction assay, the interactions listed here should be considered as putative or predicted interactions.…”
Section: Interactions With Other Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As in previous M2H studies , no strong interactions were detected between Rrp6 or Rrp44 (which is exosome-associated in yeast) and other subunits. Sometimes a protein interaction is only detectable by Y2H using a fragment of a protein, because the full-length protein may not express well in yeast, or because an interaction only occurs when a conformational change in the full-length protein exposes a subdomain (Semple et al 2002). Therefore, for proteins where no interactions were detected using full-length constructs, protein fragments corresponding to predicted structural domains were used as Y2H baits and preys.…”
Section: Subunit Interactions Of the Human Exosome Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…96 Therefore, an open access interaction viewer implemented as a Java Web Start plugin on top of the prefuse visualization toolkit (http://prefuse.org) enables dynamic browsing of our unified PPI data. This interactive tool is rich in features that facilitate the navigation through interaction maps which are regularly represented as a set of nodes connected by intermolecular edges.…”
Section: Primos Protein Interaction Network Visualization Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoactivation of the transcription factor gives rise to the generation of 'false positives', perhaps the most common problem with the Y2H system. False positives are brought about by interactions of a non-biological origin, which occur independently of any physiologically relevant protein-protein interaction; that is those which only occur in the context of the screen, and would not normally occur under normal, non-Y2H, physiological conditions (Semple et al, 2002;Droit et al, 2005;Fields, 2005).…”
Section: Yeast Two Hybrid (Y2h)mentioning
confidence: 99%