2019
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.11336144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Jurisprudence of Emergency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of understanding the state of emergency as existing outside the rule of law, Hussain argues that the relationship between the rule of law and emergency is 'as intimate as it is anxious', and that within the imperial context, emergency law is to be understood as an expression of colonial sovereignty. 34 At the level of colonial law in practice, Partha Chatterjee shows how anti-colonial violence ultimately served the same function as anti-colonial non-violence, in that both forced the state to expose its own 'legal' violence through the assertion of emergency measures that violated the ostensible principles on which colonial rule rested its authority. 35 As John Pincince argues, the very notion of 'political offences', while of central importance to British metropolitan and international law, was thus wholly excluded from the prosecution of anti-colonial revolutionary activities in India, which the imperial government instead criminalized as apolitical terrorism.…”
Section: Terrorism Security and The State Of Exceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of understanding the state of emergency as existing outside the rule of law, Hussain argues that the relationship between the rule of law and emergency is 'as intimate as it is anxious', and that within the imperial context, emergency law is to be understood as an expression of colonial sovereignty. 34 At the level of colonial law in practice, Partha Chatterjee shows how anti-colonial violence ultimately served the same function as anti-colonial non-violence, in that both forced the state to expose its own 'legal' violence through the assertion of emergency measures that violated the ostensible principles on which colonial rule rested its authority. 35 As John Pincince argues, the very notion of 'political offences', while of central importance to British metropolitan and international law, was thus wholly excluded from the prosecution of anti-colonial revolutionary activities in India, which the imperial government instead criminalized as apolitical terrorism.…”
Section: Terrorism Security and The State Of Exceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Hussain's own work, emergency's value accrues more from the genealogical investigations it enables as a hermeneutic of modern power than from its location within "civil liberties during wartime discussions." 84 Analogously, I suggest 1971's analytic significance resides more in its being a locus from which to historicize the emancipatory practices and languages that underwrote a project of postcolonial sovereignty.…”
Section: A S E C O N D a R C H I V Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Liberal-democratic nation-states, therefore, are often able to invoke the principle of the 'unity' of sovereignty to declare emergencies (decided by the sovereign) even as such forms of authoritarian sovereignty were thought to have disappeared with the advent of the democratic nation-states relying on the rule of law. 21 Simultaneously, Article 370 also enables an understanding of Kashmir as 'not an integral part of India' precisely as it emphasises the special status of Jammu and Kashmir despite Indian politicians stating that Kashmir is an integral part of India. 22 These events and histories point to India's realpolitik policy of the unity of its sovereignty in terms of territorial nationalism, which, in effect, has also generated and intensified the Kashmiri struggle for freedom.…”
Section: Sovereignty In Gendered Studies Of Kashmir: Theoretical Concmentioning
confidence: 99%