1991
DOI: 10.2307/969770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Juan Pardo Expeditions: Exploration of the Carolinas and Tennessee, 1566-1568

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sixteenth century AD, starving and overextended, Spanish colonists turned their ravenous gaze onto the interior of La Florida, what is now the southeastern United States, hoping for a safe and prosperous terrestrial route across the continent for their silver‐heavy convoys leaving Mexico. During this time, the Spanish empire, through various entradas, settlement, and trade attempts, encountered numerous and disparate Native groups within the region, facing many of their greatest challenges, and ultimately greatest defeats, at the hands of powerful Native resistance (Hudson, 2005, 2017; Knight, 2009). Traditionally, anthropologists have interpreted Western colonial entanglements from the colonizer perspective: first, we categorize the encounter as “colonial,” then we reinforce the “colonizer” perspective of an asymmetrical power dynamic tilted in favor of the Western colonizer ( sensu Dietler, 2007; Panich and Gonzalez, 2021; Voss, 2008).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the sixteenth century AD, starving and overextended, Spanish colonists turned their ravenous gaze onto the interior of La Florida, what is now the southeastern United States, hoping for a safe and prosperous terrestrial route across the continent for their silver‐heavy convoys leaving Mexico. During this time, the Spanish empire, through various entradas, settlement, and trade attempts, encountered numerous and disparate Native groups within the region, facing many of their greatest challenges, and ultimately greatest defeats, at the hands of powerful Native resistance (Hudson, 2005, 2017; Knight, 2009). Traditionally, anthropologists have interpreted Western colonial entanglements from the colonizer perspective: first, we categorize the encounter as “colonial,” then we reinforce the “colonizer” perspective of an asymmetrical power dynamic tilted in favor of the Western colonizer ( sensu Dietler, 2007; Panich and Gonzalez, 2021; Voss, 2008).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the implications of an approach embedded in the agency of Indigenous women, we have chosen to focus on one case study: the construction and demise of Fort San Juan, a short‐lived Spanish colonial outpost established in the winter of 1566 by Captain Juan Pardo at the Native town of Joara (known in the chronicles of the 1539–1543 Hernando de Soto expedition as “Xuala”), located in western North Carolina at the Berry site (31BK22), near present‐day Morganton, North Carolina. Within a year and a half, the fort was razed by Native groups, along with the other forts that Pardo established in the region, while most of the Spaniards garrisoned in the interior were killed (Beck, Rodning, and Moore, 2016; Hudson, 2005). What is regularly overlooked in narrative treatments of this and other early European colonial enterprises of the sixteenth century is that Native women often had the most frequent and sustained contact with the Spanish entradas.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations