The journey to technical excellence in agile software development

Alami, Adam; Krancher, Oliver; Paasivaara, Maria

doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106959

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In agile software development, agile practitioners interpret technical excellence as a mindset that emphasizes continuous attention to a sustainable code, learning, and teamwork. While our findings show that a mindset of continuous attention to a sustainable code is an important pillar for technical excellence in agile teams, they point to important roles of mindsets for continuous attention to learning and to the team (Alami et al 2022).…”

Section: Project Team Learning Process (Ptlp)contrasting

confidence: 69%

“…This aligns with the existing research that explores the synergy between PS and agile techniques in the context of team learning. Studies have shown that agile approaches, coupled with PS, can lead to increased knowledge sharing, continuous improvement, collective learning, enhanced team capabilities, and greater customer involvement (Marder et al 2021;Alami et al 2022;Barros et al 2024). Our finding of a weaker direct effect of public service motivation (PSM) on the project team learning process (PTLP) in fully agile project management (F-APM) needs further investigation.…”

Section: Discussion and Managerial Insightmentioning

confidence: 66%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator

Pattanatornchai,

Kohda,

Javed

et al. 2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While public service motivation (PSM) and teamwork are widely recognized as crucial drivers for effective public service delivery, researchers primarily analyze these factors independently and at a personal level. The existing literature rarely explores the interplay between PSM, the project team learning process (PTLP), and psychological safety (PS) within research and development (R&D) project teams, particularly in national R&D organizations. This study addresses this gap by proposing a theoretical model that examines the combined effect of individual motivation and team collaboration, mediated by PS, on R&D PTLP. Additionally, it investigates the moderating influence of project management (PM) styles—fully agile and partially agile—on these relationships. The proposed method utilizes partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) for quantitative data analysis. Our findings revealed a positive relationship between PSM, PS, and R&D PTLP, with PS acting as a significant mediator. Notably, the relationship between PSM and R&D PTLP was stronger under fully agile project management compared to partially agile settings. These findings suggest that both project teams and organizations should prioritize promoting PS and consider the moderating effects of project management styles to foster a sustainable R&D team learning process, particularly within national R&D institutions.

show abstract

Section: Project Team Learning Process (Ptlp)contrasting

confidence: 69%

Section: Discussion and Managerial Insightmentioning

confidence: 66%

Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator

Pattanatornchai,

Kohda,

Javed

et al. 2024

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This might be the case because psychological safety encourages employees to challenge the status quo, reframe problems, and try out creative solutions. Such unafraid conduct can be seen as the foundation of creativity and innovation, particularly in an organizational setting (Alami et al, 2023). Moreover, people's willingness to share knowledge is often a prerequisite for the success of creative work practices (Acevedo & Diaz-Molina, 2023).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological Safety and Innovative Work Behavior: Does Socially Responsible Leadership Matter?

Kyambade,

Namuddu,

Mugambwa

et al. 2024

SBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The present study investigates the relationship between innovative work behavior (IWB) and socially responsible leadership (SRL). The role of psychological safety in this relationship is also further explored in this study.Design/methodology/approach – Data were gathered from Ugandan public universities for this study. For this study, 214 employees were invited to take part. The research hypotheses were evaluated using Processes Macro and Amos.Findings – SRL has been found to effectively improve followers' Innovative work behaviour using data from Ugandan public universities. Furthermore, the primary impact of SRL on IWB of staff in public universities is mediated by psychological safety.Originality/value – This is one of the first studies to look into the relationship between followers' IWB and SRL and the mediating role of psychological safety among employees. Secondly, by investigating the mediation of psychological safety, this study expands our knowledge that binds SRL to IWB. In conclusion, our study draws from data gathered in Uganda and may offer novel perspectives to the predominantly western literature currently in circulation.

show abstract

“…Emphasizing iterative refinement and validation enhances the adaptability and resilience of the system by fostering a culture of continuous learning, improvement, and adaptation to change. Iterative development encourages a mindset of continuous learning and improvement among team members (Alami et al, 2022). By reflecting on past experiences, evaluating outcomes, and incorporating feedback from stakeholders, software development teams can identify areas for improvement and make iterative refinements to the development process.…”

Section: Emphasizing Iterative Refinement and Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancements and innovations in requirements elicitation: Developing a comprehensive conceptual model

Oladapo Adeboye Popoola,

Henry Ejiga Adama,

Chukwuekem David Okeke

et al. 2024

World J. Adv. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Requirements elicitation is a crucial phase in the software development lifecycle, ensuring that stakeholders' needs are understood and translated into system specifications. Traditional methods often face challenges such as ambiguity, inconsistency, and evolving requirements, leading to project delays and cost overruns. This review proposes a conceptual model that integrates advancements and innovations in requirements elicitation to address these challenges comprehensively. The proposed model leverages various techniques, including but not limited to, natural language processing (NLP), machine learning (ML), and human-computer interaction (HCI), to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of requirements elicitation. NLP techniques enable automated analysis of textual requirements documents, extracting key information and identifying implicit requirements. ML algorithms facilitate the prediction of potential changes in requirements based on historical data and project context, enabling proactive management of evolving requirements. Moreover, the integration of HCI principles in the requirements elicitation process enhances stakeholder engagement and collaboration. Interactive interfaces and visualization tools enable stakeholders to provide feedback in real-time, fostering a more iterative and participatory approach to requirement gathering. Additionally, techniques such as prototyping and simulation facilitate early validation of requirements, reducing the risk of misinterpretation and ensuring alignment with stakeholders' expectations. Furthermore, the proposed model emphasizes the importance of context-awareness in requirements elicitation. By considering the organizational, cultural, and environmental context of a project, the model adapts its elicitation strategies and techniques to suit specific needs and constraints. Context-awareness also enables the identification of implicit requirements that may not be explicitly stated but are crucial for the success of the system. The model also addresses the challenge of managing conflicting requirements by introducing a systematic approach to requirements prioritization and negotiation. By employing multi-criteria decision-making techniques, stakeholders can collaboratively prioritize requirements based on their importance, feasibility, and impact on project objectives. Conflict resolution mechanisms facilitate consensus-building and trade-off analysis, ensuring that the final set of requirements reflects the collective interests of all stakeholders. Additionally, the proposed model emphasizes the iterative nature of requirements elicitation, advocating for continuous refinement and validation of requirements throughout the development lifecycle. Feedback loops enable stakeholders to review and revise requirements based on evolving needs and changing circumstances, thereby enhancing the adaptability and resilience of the system. The conceptual model presented in this review represents a holistic approach to requirements elicitation, leveraging advancements and innovations in technology, human interaction, and context-awareness. By integrating these elements, the model aims to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and stakeholder satisfaction in the requirements elicitation process, ultimately contributing to the successful delivery of high-quality software systems.

show abstract

The journey to technical excellence in agile software development

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator

Effects of Public Service Motivation on R&D Project-Based Team Learning Where Psychological Safety Is a Mediator and Project Management Style Is a Moderator

Psychological Safety and Innovative Work Behavior: Does Socially Responsible Leadership Matter?

Advancements and innovations in requirements elicitation: Developing a comprehensive conceptual model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About